Tools & Wizards About Us
checks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

checks.com

Order Personal Checks Online At Affordable Prices | Checks.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

492 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

102 ms

checks.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to checks.com homepage info - get ready to check Checks best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about checks.com

Shop our exceptional collection of high-quality personal checks at cheap prices. Pay the same low price every time you reorder bank checks online.

Visit checks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Checks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checks.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,150 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.checks.com

492 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICA7NVfhqrux_10289240325103055.js

368 ms

launch-a3d4a6cc29f1.min.js

44 ms

css

324 ms

home

325 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Checks.com, 48% (29 requests) were made to Checks-res.cloudinary.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Dpm.demdex.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (625 ms) belongs to the original domain Checks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 239.7 kB (40%)

Content Size

604.0 kB

After Optimization

364.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Checks.com main page is 604.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 292.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 40.3 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 42.3 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 261.9 kB
  • After minification 260.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 198.3 kB

  • Original 292.8 kB
  • After minification 292.8 kB
  • After compression 94.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (49%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.checks.com

www.checks.com

492 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICA7NVfhqrux_10289240325103055.js

ruxitagentjs_ICA7NVfhqrux_10289240325103055.js

368 ms

launch-a3d4a6cc29f1.min.js

launch-a3d4a6cc29f1.min.js

44 ms

css

css

324 ms

home

home

325 ms

jquery

jquery

625 ms

knockout

knockout

550 ms

cookie

cookie

251 ms

site

site

358 ms

home

home

381 ms

header

header

401 ms

carousel

carousel

407 ms

carousel

carousel

524 ms

popular-checks

popular-checks

464 ms

gmogs_image_100-40_en_dblue.js

gmogs_image_100-40_en_dblue.js

43 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

65 ms

checks-logo

checks-logo

89 ms

blue-seal-96-50-whitetxt-directtoconsumer-96353108.png

blue-seal-96-50-whitetxt-directtoconsumer-96353108.png

69 ms

gs_noscript_100-40_en.gif

gs_noscript_100-40_en.gif

44 ms

trackmyorder_icon

trackmyorder_icon

116 ms

cart_icon

cart_icon

177 ms

search

search

174 ms

classic_icon

classic_icon

173 ms

animal_icon

animal_icon

177 ms

modern_icon

modern_icon

178 ms

hero

hero

144 ms

best-value

best-value

163 ms

best-value_mobile

best-value_mobile

187 ms

autumn-leaf-check-1

autumn-leaf-check-1

220 ms

horse-play-check-1

horse-play-check-1

221 ms

mickey-adventures-check-1

mickey-adventures-check-1

241 ms

penguin-parade-check-1

penguin-parade-check-1

222 ms

renaissance-check-1

renaissance-check-1

240 ms

securiguard-blue-check-1

securiguard-blue-check-1

209 ms

savvy-check-1

savvy-check-1

235 ms

watercolors-davis-check-1

watercolors-davis-check-1

266 ms

tinker-bell-check-1

tinker-bell-check-1

264 ms

geometric-check-1

geometric-check-1

265 ms

botanical-silhouettes-check-1

botanical-silhouettes-check-1

254 ms

disney-princess-new-check-1

disney-princess-new-check-1

282 ms

lock_icon

lock_icon

283 ms

truck_icon

truck_icon

271 ms

thumbsup_icon

thumbsup_icon

287 ms

cpsa-logo

cpsa-logo

350 ms

EX856c64fa978c48b888ace1163092fa49-libraryCode_source.min.js

EX856c64fa978c48b888ace1163092fa49-libraryCode_source.min.js

15 ms

rd

rd

8 ms

dest5.html

dest5.html

21 ms

id

id

49 ms

ibs:dpid=411&dpuuid=ZkYcDQAAAHvQkwNz

ibs:dpid=411&dpuuid=ZkYcDQAAAHvQkwNz

10 ms

ibs:dpid=358&dpuuid=921772354850655772

ibs:dpid=358&dpuuid=921772354850655772

5 ms

pixel

pixel

28 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

ibs:dpid=771&dpuuid=CAESEEzezfauJGCVenEr6WPVAnY&google_cver=1

ibs:dpid=771&dpuuid=CAESEEzezfauJGCVenEr6WPVAnY&google_cver=1

14 ms

ibs:dpid=1957&dpuuid=1B4110B7D8C3692424B10436D9D16807

ibs:dpid=1957&dpuuid=1B4110B7D8C3692424B10436D9D16807

11 ms

underline-lg

underline-lg

20 ms

check

check

248 ms

underline-sm

underline-sm

249 ms

siteSeal.do

siteSeal.do

220 ms

b.php

b.php

27 ms

siteSealImage.do

siteSealImage.do

189 ms

Accessibility Review

checks.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Best Practices

checks.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

checks.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

checks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Checks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: