2.2 sec in total
166 ms
1.9 sec
66 ms
Click here to check amazing Chemicalwatch content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chemicalwatch.com
Visit chemicalwatch.comWe analyzed Chemicalwatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 166 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
chemicalwatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value23.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value3,410 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
166 ms
351 ms
395 ms
156 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Chemicalwatch.com, 89% (32 requests) were made to Product.enhesa.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn.calibermind.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Product.enhesa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 32.3 kB (76%)
42.3 kB
10.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Chemicalwatch.com main page is 42.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 41.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (94%)
33
2
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chemicalwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
chemicalwatch.com
166 ms
chemicalwatch.com
351 ms
product.enhesa.com
395 ms
gtm.js
156 ms
identifyEmail.latest.js
34 ms
4a4af0748184f536.css
256 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
435 ms
webpack-3779d6cb2c541147.js
351 ms
framework-e0f26494c9ff40eb.js
520 ms
main-383bac92f62a011d.js
456 ms
_app-ae6aabc85d139939.js
605 ms
b637e9a5-d320adbea882f75e.js
488 ms
36a89214-99574bac2beecd85.js
617 ms
5348-ae1035628090c0f1.js
529 ms
7478-cf49071a88286e71.js
537 ms
8381-7db201b4f4f3d788.js
588 ms
7772-e1c73185031a47ca.js
632 ms
6455-a3bf895bb47be263.js
629 ms
3165-70e4772be7f4557d.js
628 ms
7448-84b8ae76878ca2cd.js
922 ms
6621-cdd02bc7c0e6d465.js
783 ms
6259-2565ab397732d0c3.js
697 ms
6648-adc569b8ed53af97.js
833 ms
8369-55cbfef874c7a355.js
713 ms
3054-5af459c96abc673b.js
719 ms
7189-869d9e71bcfbed10.js
788 ms
8335-57451b245865a9c1.js
802 ms
9656-abb1399a3f5a6b45.js
806 ms
5445-fb494303c0e7a7b2.js
912 ms
3595-d27017dc1e9fc66e.js
876 ms
706-5478ea1cbdd0ea16.js
891 ms
index-2ea26196275915f3.js
890 ms
_buildManifest.js
916 ms
_ssgManifest.js
993 ms
calibermind.js
1014 ms
gtm.js
76 ms
chemicalwatch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
chemicalwatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
chemicalwatch.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chemicalwatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Chemicalwatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chemicalwatch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chemicalwatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: