Tools & Wizards About Us
chengetawildlife.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

chengetawildlife.org

Home - Chengeta Wildlife

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

8.4 sec

Page Rendered

416 ms

chengetawildlife.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Chengeta Wildlife content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chengetawildlife.org

Visit chengetawildlife.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Chengetawildlife.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chengetawildlife.org performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chengetawildlife.org

1014 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

89 ms

frontend.min.css

435 ms

swiper.min.css

352 ms

post-3857.css

266 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Chengetawildlife.org, 2% (1 request) were made to Moderate.cleantalk.org and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Chengetawildlife.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (36%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chengetawildlife.org main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chengeta Wildlife images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 283.8 kB

  • Original 405.5 kB
  • After minification 405.5 kB
  • After compression 121.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 283.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 648.0 kB

  • Original 726.6 kB
  • After minification 721.6 kB
  • After compression 78.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chengetawildlife.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 648.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (49%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chengeta Wildlife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chengetawildlife.org

chengetawildlife.org

1014 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

89 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

435 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

352 ms

post-3857.css

post-3857.css

266 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

699 ms

post-3929.css

post-3929.css

353 ms

post-3884.css

post-3884.css

267 ms

post-3878.css

post-3878.css

354 ms

style.css

style.css

355 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

523 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

526 ms

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

41 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

18 ms

post-1215.css

post-1215.css

439 ms

post-3870.css

post-3870.css

444 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

519 ms

script.js

script.js

525 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

531 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

609 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

608 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

776 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

613 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

617 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

776 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

775 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

776 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

777 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

807 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

807 ms

679633d66e9f982470ded6bb8abf91b8.gif

679633d66e9f982470ded6bb8abf91b8.gif

413 ms

Chengeta-logo.jpg

Chengeta-logo.jpg

93 ms

forest-top-down.jpg

forest-top-down.jpg

5804 ms

News-Page-_-Our-Blog-Alice-Peretie-scaled-e1706264422768.jpg

News-Page-_-Our-Blog-Alice-Peretie-scaled-e1706264422768.jpg

443 ms

wwf.png

wwf.png

92 ms

wild-foundation.png

wild-foundation.png

157 ms

langland.png

langland.png

158 ms

european-union.png

european-union.png

180 ms

salonga.png

salonga.png

181 ms

c-f-c.png

c-f-c.png

246 ms

the-helvellyn-foundation.png

the-helvellyn-foundation.png

245 ms

dzanga.png

dzanga.png

267 ms

nouable.png

nouable.png

267 ms

pangolin.png

pangolin.png

333 ms

iccn.png

iccn.png

333 ms

minusma.png

minusma.png

354 ms

the-dm-lab.png

the-dm-lab.png

356 ms

kinetic-6.png

kinetic-6.png

440 ms

efc_logo.png

efc_logo.png

420 ms

wcs.png

wcs.png

444 ms

aap.png

aap.png

447 ms

tfc.png

tfc.png

508 ms

logo.png

logo.png

527 ms

irf-logo.png

irf-logo.png

529 ms

ursa-logo.png

ursa-logo.png

531 ms

Home-Page-_-Get-in-touch-section-banner-e1703832967391.jpg

Home-Page-_-Get-in-touch-section-banner-e1703832967391.jpg

485 ms

Accessibility Review

chengetawildlife.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

chengetawildlife.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chengetawildlife.org SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chengetawildlife.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chengetawildlife.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chengetawildlife.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chengeta Wildlife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: