Tools & Wizards About Us
chesapeake.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

chesapeake.net

Broadband and dialup Internet for Southern Maryland

Page Load Speed

786 ms in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

487 ms

Page Rendered

110 ms

chesapeake.net screenshot

About Website

Visit chesapeake.net now to see the best up-to-date Chesapeake content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chesapeake.net

Serving the Chesapeake Bay Region since 1996, Chesapeake.Net is the region's favorite and most reliable dialup and high-speed internet service provider (ISP) - Now offering national dialup access.

Visit chesapeake.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Chesapeake.net page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 597 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chesapeake.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

chesapeake.net

189 ms

redirect.js

36 ms

runNetWeather.js

94 ms

setNetWeather.js

93 ms

fusion.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Chesapeake.net, 13% (2 requests) were made to Netweather.accuweather.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Static.mobilewebsiteserver.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (204 ms) belongs to the original domain Chesapeake.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.8 kB (27%)

Content Size

97.1 kB

After Optimization

71.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chesapeake.net main page is 97.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 78.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 11.3 kB
  • After minification 10.5 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 78.7 kB
  • After minification 65.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chesapeake needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 745 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chesapeake.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (21%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chesapeake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chesapeake.net

chesapeake.net

189 ms

redirect.js

redirect.js

36 ms

runNetWeather.js

runNetWeather.js

94 ms

setNetWeather.js

setNetWeather.js

93 ms

fusion.css

fusion.css

67 ms

style.css

style.css

128 ms

site.css

site.css

133 ms

quotebr.js

quotebr.js

8 ms

wotd2.js

wotd2.js

13 ms

wotd2.js

wotd2.js

13 ms

clearpixel.gif

clearpixel.gif

68 ms

leftmarginlinkbar.jpg

leftmarginlinkbar.jpg

204 ms

spacerlinkbar.jpg

spacerlinkbar.jpg

144 ms

topmarginlinkbar.jpg

topmarginlinkbar.jpg

189 ms

vertline.jpg

vertline.jpg

92 ms

Edgewave_logo.jpg

Edgewave_logo.jpg

154 ms

SEO Factors

chesapeake.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chesapeake.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chesapeake.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

chesapeake.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chesapeake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: