23.3 sec in total
884 ms
21.3 sec
1.1 sec
Visit chevenwedding.com now to see the best up-to-date Chevenwedding content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chevenwedding.com
Search on topics your interested. Read great personalised news.
Visit chevenwedding.comWe analyzed Chevenwedding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 884 ms and then it took 22.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
chevenwedding.com performance score
884 ms
71 ms
70 ms
144 ms
335 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Chevenwedding.com, 16% (12 requests) were made to Img2.smartsearch.me and 13% (10 requests) were made to Simcast.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Img4.smartsearch.me.
Page size can be reduced by 643.2 kB (44%)
1.5 MB
833.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Chevenwedding.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 645.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chevenwedding images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 249.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 337.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chevenwedding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 337.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (46%)
50
27
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chevenwedding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
simcast.com
884 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
71 ms
html.css
70 ms
all.min.css
144 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
335 ms
gpt.js
356 ms
enhance.js
1712 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
343 ms
jquery.modal.min.css
354 ms
modal.css
234 ms
login.js
232 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2269 ms
simcastlogo_35y.png
167 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2111 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
19758 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2111 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2110 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2110 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2111 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2264 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2263 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2263 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2224 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2224 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2224 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2224 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2224 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2224 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2224 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
2223 ms
pubads_impl_2020102201.js
30 ms
BB1auCXJ.img
55 ms
BB18qTPD.img
82 ms
BB1auvU9.img
92 ms
BBNvr53.img
38 ms
BB1auyLa.img
41 ms
AACl4vY.img
6 ms
BB14LSTu.img
15 ms
BB1auCJ8.img
12 ms
BB1auCWa.img
11 ms
AAywGC0.img
6 ms
BB1autoA.img
6 ms
BB1audTG.img
4 ms
AABiyAn.img
4 ms
BB1auJD5.img
5 ms
integrator.js
281 ms
ads
316 ms
container.html
292 ms
BB1auM0v.img
34 ms
jmZlp9o9KQo
435 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
417 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
403 ms
smart.js
450 ms
osd_listener.js
239 ms
osd.js
347 ms
ads
171 ms
js.php
260 ms
www-player.css
161 ms
www-embed-player.js
227 ms
base.js
554 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
226 ms
2364309221291099109
860 ms
abg_lite.js
860 ms
window_focus.js
924 ms
notfound.php
619 ms
ac
1727 ms
ac
1724 ms
ac
1702 ms
id
1312 ms
ad_status.js
1164 ms
embed.js
169 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
223 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
246 ms
activeview
95 ms
log_event
20 ms
chevenwedding.com SEO score
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chevenwedding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chevenwedding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chevenwedding.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chevenwedding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: