Tools & Wizards About Us
chipsea.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

chipsea.net

ChiPsea-mall - ChiPsea-mall

Page Load Speed

11 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

9.4 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

chipsea.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chipsea.net homepage info - get ready to check Chi Psea best content right away, or after learning these important things about chipsea.net

ChiPsea-mall

Visit chipsea.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Chipsea.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chipsea.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.226

55/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chipsea.net

1384 ms

animate.min.css

431 ms

font-awesome.min.css

427 ms

bootstrap.min.css

652 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

437 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Chipsea.net, 21% (10 requests) were made to Media.digikey.com and 2% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Chipsea.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 504.3 kB (62%)

Content Size

812.1 kB

After Optimization

307.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chipsea.net main page is 812.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 315.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 143.7 kB

  • Original 155.5 kB
  • After minification 86.2 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 69.3 kB, which is 45% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.7 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 149.8 kB

  • Original 315.2 kB
  • After minification 165.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chi Psea needs image optimization as it can save up to 149.8 kB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 193.6 kB

  • Original 271.5 kB
  • After minification 248.1 kB
  • After compression 78.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 69.8 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chipsea.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (40%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chi Psea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chipsea.net

chipsea.net

1384 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

431 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

427 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

652 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

437 ms

basic.css

basic.css

441 ms

style.css

style.css

674 ms

kefu.min.css

kefu.min.css

640 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

647 ms

%E5%BE%AE%E4%BF%A1%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%87_20181029075047.png

%E5%BE%AE%E4%BF%A1%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%87_20181029075047.png

4785 ms

2da2e54311849424e0c5ab5549994977.jpg

2da2e54311849424e0c5ab5549994977.jpg

4421 ms

324b47f547ce6a5b8fc5f3e6cb96b9fe.jpg

324b47f547ce6a5b8fc5f3e6cb96b9fe.jpg

2762 ms

loading_0.gif

loading_0.gif

2158 ms

home_bottom.png

home_bottom.png

2162 ms

b_01.png

b_01.png

1789 ms

b_02.png

b_02.png

2015 ms

b_03.png

b_03.png

2240 ms

b_04.png

b_04.png

3245 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

2176 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

6795 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

4405 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

2772 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

3835 ms

layer.js

layer.js

4562 ms

scrollfix.min.js

scrollfix.min.js

4049 ms

common.js

common.js

5752 ms

swiper.jquery.min.js

swiper.jquery.min.js

7118 ms

scroll.js

scroll.js

4621 ms

headimg_01.png

headimg_01.png

4298 ms

headimg_02.png

headimg_02.png

4315 ms

headimg_03.png

headimg_03.png

4357 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

7081 ms

wAJWm7IAAAAeJxtys0SgiAUBlA+E1D7szepdj0OAsEdHajoTtrTN03bzvqISvx04r8eFVaoIaGg0aBFhzU22GKHPXocBOb2yQOZfD5eZBmXm69Hf2U1ES8myZnSTGrJKUTWjkyKbOQ3nNT9YbPzTcj8Yhu9nKhEko5poKbEzNakoN+RHKUgxAe5MSTs

wAJWm7IAAAAeJxtys0SgiAUBlA+E1D7szepdj0OAsEdHajoTtrTN03bzvqISvx04r8eFVaoIaGg0aBFhzU22GKHPXocBOb2yQOZfD5eZBmXm69Hf2U1ES8myZnSTGrJKUTWjkyKbOQ3nNT9YbPzTcj8Yhu9nKhEko5poKbEzNakoN+RHKUgxAe5MSTs

0 ms

layer.css

layer.css

214 ms

cartnums.html

cartnums.html

671 ms

quotenums.html

quotenums.html

690 ms

48-BSSOP.jpg

48-BSSOP.jpg

422 ms

48-TSSOP-DGG.jpg

48-TSSOP-DGG.jpg

291 ms

14PDIP.jpg

14PDIP.jpg

341 ms

8-SOIC.jpg

8-SOIC.jpg

242 ms

DRV-6-SON%20Pkg.jpg

DRV-6-SON%20Pkg.jpg

331 ms

MT29F4G-63VFBGA.jpg

MT29F4G-63VFBGA.jpg

416 ms

8-MLP%20(3x3).jpg

8-MLP%20(3x3).jpg

560 ms

lists.html

lists.html

598 ms

24-SOIC.jpg

24-SOIC.jpg

578 ms

14-SOIC.jpg

14-SOIC.jpg

668 ms

TSOT-23-6.jpg

TSOT-23-6.jpg

741 ms

Accessibility Review

chipsea.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

chipsea.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chipsea.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chipsea.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chipsea.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chipsea.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chi Psea. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: