Tools & Wizards About Us
choiceblinds.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

choiceblinds.co.uk

Choice Blinds in Birmingham, 10% OFF All Quotes Done Before Christmas 2024 in Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

241 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

choiceblinds.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Choice Blinds content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about choiceblinds.co.uk

Choice Blinds Sutton Coldfield, 10% OFF All Quotes Done Before Christmas 2024

Visit choiceblinds.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Choiceblinds.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choiceblinds.co.uk performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choiceblinds.co.uk

241 ms

www.choiceblinds.co.uk

586 ms

css

32 ms

bootstrap.min.css

329 ms

font-awesome.min.css

409 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Choiceblinds.co.uk, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (658 ms) belongs to the original domain Choiceblinds.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 423.8 kB (62%)

Content Size

688.0 kB

After Optimization

264.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Choiceblinds.co.uk main page is 688.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 304.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 98.9 kB
  • After minification 98.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choice Blinds images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 184.0 kB

  • Original 304.7 kB
  • After minification 278.1 kB
  • After compression 120.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 216.9 kB

  • Original 255.7 kB
  • After minification 240.7 kB
  • After compression 38.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choiceblinds.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (88%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Blinds. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choiceblinds.co.uk

choiceblinds.co.uk

241 ms

www.choiceblinds.co.uk

www.choiceblinds.co.uk

586 ms

css

css

32 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

329 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

409 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

488 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

411 ms

main.css

main.css

413 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

337 ms

FancyZoom.js

FancyZoom.js

414 ms

FancyZoomHTML.js

FancyZoomHTML.js

415 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

492 ms

icon.css

icon.css

494 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

495 ms

mystyle.css

mystyle.css

505 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

504 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

23 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

570 ms

custom.js

custom.js

573 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

658 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

504 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

509 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

510 ms

main.js

main.js

578 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

580 ms

platform.js

platform.js

35 ms

css

css

20 ms

logo-text.png

logo-text.png

247 ms

ReturnImage.asp

ReturnImage.asp

356 ms

ReturnImage.asp

ReturnImage.asp

460 ms

ReturnImage.asp

ReturnImage.asp

506 ms

ReturnImage.asp

ReturnImage.asp

608 ms

ReturnImage.asp

ReturnImage.asp

534 ms

ReturnImage.asp

ReturnImage.asp

515 ms

ReturnImage.asp

ReturnImage.asp

470 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

8 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

12 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

15 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

16 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

16 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

455 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

25 ms

Accessibility Review

choiceblinds.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

choiceblinds.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

choiceblinds.co.uk SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choiceblinds.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choiceblinds.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choiceblinds.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choice Blinds. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: