7 sec in total
251 ms
6.5 sec
250 ms
Visit chris-linfoot.net now to see the best up-to-date Chris Linfoot content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chris-linfoot.net
Some of our services Cyber Security Audit Breach Investigation Incident Response Consulting Internet-of-Things On-premises, Cloud and Hybrid Deployment Security Cyber Essentials ISO27000 Training Read...
Visit chris-linfoot.netWe analyzed Chris-linfoot.net page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
chris-linfoot.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value7,690 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.112
87/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
251 ms
3142 ms
57 ms
243 ms
258 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Chris-linfoot.net, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Cardinia.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 106.3 kB (19%)
562.6 kB
456.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Chris-linfoot.net main page is 562.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 308.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chris Linfoot needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chris-linfoot.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (81%)
42
8
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chris Linfoot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cardinia.co.uk
251 ms
www.cardinia.co.uk
3142 ms
js
57 ms
style.min.css
243 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
258 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
386 ms
dark-floating.css
260 ms
styles.css
259 ms
front-flex.min.css
265 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
420 ms
style.css
521 ms
css
35 ms
stt.min.css
427 ms
wp-featherlight.min.css
467 ms
jetpack.css
515 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
474 ms
modernizr.custom.20160801.js
504 ms
jquery.min.js
725 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
636 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
cookieconsent.latest.min.js
566 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
514 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
523 ms
index.js
528 ms
underscore.min.js
601 ms
main.min.js
726 ms
wai-aria.js
616 ms
wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js
683 ms
wp-embed.min.js
684 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
815 ms
mailcheck.min.js
724 ms
punycode.min.js
737 ms
wpforms.js
816 ms
api.js
61 ms
e-202240.js
42 ms
collect
13 ms
background_1920_dark.jpg
702 ms
cardinia80flat.png
226 ms
background_cardinia_consultpress-480x145.jpg
259 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
20 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
64 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf_.ttf
76 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf
77 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
352 ms
recaptcha__en.js
32 ms
fallback
25 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
css
15 ms
logo_48.png
3 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
4 ms
chris-linfoot.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
chris-linfoot.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
chris-linfoot.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chris-linfoot.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chris-linfoot.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chris-linfoot.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chris Linfoot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: