8.6 sec in total
780 ms
6.4 sec
1.4 sec
Visit christchurchdailyphoto.com now to see the best up-to-date Christchurch Daily Photo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about christchurchdailyphoto.com
A 'not so daily' photo of Christchurch
Visit christchurchdailyphoto.comWe analyzed Christchurchdailyphoto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 780 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
christchurchdailyphoto.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value2.9 s
81/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
780 ms
62 ms
43 ms
120 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Christchurchdailyphoto.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (15%)
7.2 MB
6.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Christchurchdailyphoto.com main page is 7.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 150.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Christchurch Daily Photo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 558.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 558.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 328.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Christchurchdailyphoto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 328.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (56%)
94
41
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Christchurch Daily Photo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.christchurchdailyphoto.com
780 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
62 ms
css
43 ms
style.css
120 ms
style.css
172 ms
compiled.css
229 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
181 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
194 ms
style.css
202 ms
social-logos.min.css
277 ms
jetpack.css
252 ms
jquery.js
312 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
268 ms
photon.js
265 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
21 ms
gprofiles.js
22 ms
wpgroho.js
281 ms
plugins.js
450 ms
main.js
482 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
481 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
451 ms
wp-embed.min.js
451 ms
spin.js
480 ms
jquery.spin.js
480 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
480 ms
postmessage.js
479 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
644 ms
queuehandler.js
646 ms
sharing.js
647 ms
e-201736.js
21 ms
DSC01369.jpg
227 ms
DSC01650.jpg
874 ms
wp-image-1749260304.jpg
1958 ms
21294290_1147341502065389_4451393045757165568_n.jpg
1478 ms
DSC01651.jpg
966 ms
DSC01626.jpg
1341 ms
wp-image-1749260304.jpg
1323 ms
wp-image-827551425.jpg
1021 ms
wp-image-104114352.jpg
1316 ms
DSC01650.jpg
908 ms
DSC01652.jpg
909 ms
DSC01590.jpg
965 ms
wp-image-1907670623.jpg
1267 ms
logo.png
274 ms
circle-logo.png
776 ms
21227427_158345741412087_8200879429077958656_n.jpg
1548 ms
21149071_2075551982470901_3825220619687952384_n.jpg
1625 ms
21149618_1700885143551638_3531410995119390720_n.jpg
1896 ms
21042694_1710640172344063_7572512261835587584_n.jpg
1895 ms
21042336_1907888592797320_5947088618878140416_n.jpg
1897 ms
20987321_164045440813485_3127219104725860352_n.jpg
1825 ms
20969329_111309039587000_3798581359912419328_n.jpg
1690 ms
20968578_280717815668338_6441319052613779456_n.jpg
1920 ms
DSC01581.jpg
905 ms
DSC01369.jpg
905 ms
DSC01581.jpg
905 ms
DSC01643.jpg
1510 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
891 ms
E4YVLCG37sfvbHtA5q6EAQ.woff
1049 ms
LbsI-iVkYe8MYUm9lUSYh_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
1155 ms
gjALpX3Bp5l7Vc3J156EmfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
1156 ms
2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CZa6Tn9fxpDPuRSK4Gn5Ybw.woff
1155 ms
wcYJIEUIwMaAAArwwHdAAA=
2 ms
social-logos.eot
763 ms
icomoon.ttf
977 ms
master.html
956 ms
hovercard.css
546 ms
services.css
661 ms
count.json
489 ms
g.gif
484 ms
graph.facebook.com
520 ms
count.json
515 ms
graph.facebook.com
577 ms
count.json
516 ms
graph.facebook.com
576 ms
count.json
516 ms
graph.facebook.com
646 ms
count.json
515 ms
graph.facebook.com
645 ms
g.gif
461 ms
g.gif
460 ms
g.gif
486 ms
g.gif
486 ms
g.gif
486 ms
g.gif
487 ms
g.gif
489 ms
g.gif
488 ms
g.gif
489 ms
g.gif
486 ms
jquery.js
33 ms
postmessage.js
9 ms
jed.js
13 ms
underscore.min.js
13 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
2 ms
35 ms
4 ms
likes-rest.js
6 ms
batch
46 ms
2 ms
noticons.css
7 ms
style.css
2 ms
Noticons.svg
4 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
1 ms
christchurchdailyphoto.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
christchurchdailyphoto.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
christchurchdailyphoto.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Christchurchdailyphoto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Christchurchdailyphoto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
christchurchdailyphoto.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Christchurch Daily Photo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: