5.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.5 sec
176 ms
Welcome to cift.res.in homepage info - get ready to check Cift best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about cift.res.in
Visit cift.res.inWe analyzed Cift.res.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
cift.res.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value1.1 s
100/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
1092 ms
872 ms
670 ms
445 ms
459 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Cift.res.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cift.res.in.
Page size can be reduced by 105.3 kB (32%)
327.2 kB
221.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Cift.res.in main page is 327.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 214.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cift images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 41.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cift.res.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (20%)
40
32
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
cift.res.in
1092 ms
jquery-1.2.6.min.js
872 ms
style.css
670 ms
cssverticalmenu.css
445 ms
cssverticalmenu.js
459 ms
script.js
457 ms
counter.php
456 ms
thumb_1803457113_2014-08-21_04-08-20.jpg
692 ms
thumb_111483164_2013-08-12_11-22-55.png
692 ms
thumb_1211686140_2012-06-26_10-45-46.jpg
702 ms
thumb_284369318_2012-04-07_09-44-18.jpg
718 ms
thumb_2048050998_2012-04-10_10-17-32.JPG
727 ms
thumb_381123666_2012-04-10_12-15-45.jpg
712 ms
thumb_1018732670_2012-03-15_02-46-55.jpg
1138 ms
thumb_1173929985_2011-09-28_03-36-17.JPG
1142 ms
bg.jpg
433 ms
top_img2.jpg
445 ms
logo_img.jpg
442 ms
hindilogo.jpg
452 ms
top_img1.jpg
677 ms
menuspace.jpg
467 ms
menu_head_bg.jpg
869 ms
menu_bg.jpg
873 ms
arrow.png
886 ms
submenu_bg.jpg
893 ms
image1.jpg
1154 ms
image2.jpg
1348 ms
image3.jpg
1532 ms
update_topbg.jpg
1306 ms
bullet.jpg
1323 ms
head1.jpg
1335 ms
head2.jpg
1590 ms
bullet2.jpg
1738 ms
head3.jpg
1754 ms
blue_bg.jpg
1768 ms
rightbullet.png
1784 ms
news_bg.jpg
1971 ms
newshead_bg.jpg
2021 ms
events_head.jpg
2171 ms
icons.gif
2180 ms
hit_head.jpg
2199 ms
footer_bg.jpg
2219 ms
arrow.gif
221 ms
cift.res.in accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
cift.res.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
cift.res.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cift.res.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cift.res.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cift.res.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cift. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: