Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

cimtar.info

cimtar.info

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

193 ms

cimtar.info screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cimtar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cimtar.info

Visit cimtar.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Cimtar.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cimtar.info performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,900 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.355

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cimtar.info

1849 ms

main.css

252 ms

show_ads.js

6 ms

ga.js

49 ms

cimtar-logo.png

596 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Cimtar.info, 13% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Cimtar.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

186.4 kB

After Optimization

153.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Cimtar.info main page is 186.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 117.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 117.3 kB
  • After minification 109.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cimtar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 47.9 kB
  • After minification 47.7 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cimtar.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (50%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cimtar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cimtar.info accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cimtar.info best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cimtar.info SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-2

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cimtar.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Cimtar.info main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-2. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cimtar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: