6.3 sec in total
534 ms
5.3 sec
395 ms
Visit citytop.ru now to see the best up-to-date Citytop content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about citytop.ru
Грязезащитные покрытия и системы грязезащиты от производителя «СитиТоп» в Москве. Большой ассортимент, собственное производство, контроль качества. Замер, доставка, монтаж, проектирование систем грязе...
Visit citytop.ruWe analyzed Citytop.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 534 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
citytop.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value430 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.063
97/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
534 ms
2635 ms
266 ms
397 ms
400 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Citytop.ru, 2% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Citytop.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 502.7 kB (48%)
1.0 MB
537.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Citytop.ru main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 490.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 444.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 444.4 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Citytop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Citytop.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (52%)
66
32
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Citytop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
citytop.ru
534 ms
citytop.ru
2635 ms
ui.design-tokens.min.css
266 ms
ui.font.opensans.min.css
397 ms
main.popup.bundle.min.css
400 ms
popup.min.css
401 ms
style.css
402 ms
styles.css
401 ms
template_styles.min.css
668 ms
core.min.js
665 ms
dexie3.bundle.min.js
703 ms
core_ls.min.js
539 ms
core_fx.min.js
531 ms
core_frame_cache.min.js
539 ms
protobuf.min.js
800 ms
model.min.js
709 ms
rest.client.min.js
708 ms
pull.client.min.js
799 ms
main.popup.bundle.min.js
812 ms
pageobject.min.js
814 ms
core_window.min.js
938 ms
cphttprequest.min.js
815 ms
script.js
930 ms
start_script.js
931 ms
jquery-1.8.1.js
825 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.js
825 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
996 ms
jquery.inputmask.js
994 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.1.min.js
994 ms
jquery.inputmask-multi.js
994 ms
slick.css
995 ms
slick.min.js
23 ms
interface.js
995 ms
script.js
1069 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
1068 ms
ba.js
1072 ms
analytics.js
178 ms
logo.gif
1066 ms
head_email.png
1066 ms
head_phone.png
1066 ms
head_map.png
1067 ms
login.png
1069 ms
%D0%A0%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B0_1440%D1%85416_66.jpg
1070 ms
%D0%A0%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B0_1440%D1%85416_66.jpg
1073 ms
portfolio_ico.png
1070 ms
%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%BC%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B92.jpg
1070 ms
Portf_1.jpg
1070 ms
cmar1.jpg
1071 ms
morsk1.jpg
1071 ms
ico-a1.jpg
1072 ms
ico-a2.jpg
1073 ms
ico-a3.jpg
1072 ms
ico-a4.jpg
1073 ms
ico-a5.jpg
1073 ms
ico-a6.jpg
1073 ms
ico-a7.jpg
1073 ms
zone_3.jpg
1078 ms
p1.png
1074 ms
p2.png
1073 ms
p3.png
1074 ms
p4.png
1074 ms
captcha.php
1074 ms
logo-footer-new.png
1072 ms
sprite.png
1072 ms
small_cart.png
1006 ms
open-sans.woff
905 ms
opensans-regular.woff
958 ms
opensans-light.woff
904 ms
opensans-semibold.woff
1012 ms
opensans-bold.woff
1019 ms
Solomon-Sans-SemiBold.woff
934 ms
collect
13 ms
js
837 ms
Solomon-Sans-Bold.woff
884 ms
Solomon-Sans-Normal.woff
163 ms
play.woff
163 ms
Solomon-Sans-Book.woff
162 ms
MyriadPro-Regular.woff
163 ms
open-sans-semibold.woff
267 ms
social-network.png
273 ms
bx_stat
189 ms
citytop.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
citytop.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
citytop.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Citytop.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Citytop.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
citytop.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Citytop. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: