Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

classic95.net

Класик 95 ЕООД - PVC и алуминиева дограма, окачени фасади, зимни градини, парапети и ремонти

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

608 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

219 ms

classic95.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Classic 95 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about classic95.net

Качествени PVC и алуминиеви прозорци и врати, окачени фасади, зимни градини, парапети и ремонти от Класик 95 ЕООД с гаранционен срок и обслужване на готовата продукция до 36 месеца.

Visit classic95.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Classic95.net page load time and found that the first response time was 608 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classic95.net performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.142

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

classic95.net

608 ms

style.css

149 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

297 ms

config.js

319 ms

jquery.js

765 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Classic95.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (923 ms) belongs to the original domain Classic95.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 162.9 kB (35%)

Content Size

465.8 kB

After Optimization

302.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Classic95.net main page is 465.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 251.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 8.2 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 195.7 kB
  • After minification 188.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classic 95 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 141.3 kB

  • Original 251.4 kB
  • After minification 251.1 kB
  • After compression 110.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 141.3 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classic95.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (19%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classic 95. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

classic95.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

classic95.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

classic95.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    BG

  • Language Claimed

    BG

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classic95.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Bulgarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Classic95.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classic 95. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: