6.3 sec in total
343 ms
5.7 sec
190 ms
Visit classicaviva.net now to see the best up-to-date Classicaviva content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about classicaviva.net
-
Visit classicaviva.netWe analyzed Classicaviva.net page load time and found that the first response time was 343 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
classicaviva.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0.9 s
100/100
25%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
343 ms
813 ms
267 ms
432 ms
830 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Classicaviva.net, 4% (4 requests) were made to Classicaviva.homeip.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Classicaviva.homeip.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (28%)
4.9 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Classicaviva.net main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classicaviva images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 960.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 960.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 276.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicaviva.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 276.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (68%)
80
26
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classicaviva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
classicaviva.net
343 ms
www.classicaviva.net
813 ms
style.css
267 ms
font-awesome.css
432 ms
application.min.css
830 ms
button.css
263 ms
jquery.1.9.0.min.js
676 ms
jquery-migrate-1.1.0.min.js
320 ms
colorbox.css
425 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
557 ms
jquery.cookiebar.css
456 ms
jquery.cookiebar.js
624 ms
aes.js
636 ms
sha512-min.js
633 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
583 ms
responsiveslides.css
649 ms
themes.css
675 ms
addthis_widget.js
47 ms
jquery.maskedinput.js
676 ms
parsley.js
783 ms
jquery.uniform.js
766 ms
select2.js
1115 ms
jquery.autogrow-textarea.js
805 ms
underscore-min.js
876 ms
bootstrap-transition.js
882 ms
bootstrap-collapse.js
889 ms
bootstrap-alert.js
910 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
931 ms
bootstrap-popover.js
1008 ms
bootstrap-button.js
1010 ms
bootstrap-dropdown.js
1031 ms
bootstrap-modal.js
1056 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
1094 ms
bootstrap-select.js
1209 ms
wysihtml5-0.3.0_rc2.js
1431 ms
bootstrap-wysihtml5.js
1239 ms
bootstrap-switch.js
1190 ms
bootstrap-colorpicker.js
1324 ms
app.js
1255 ms
settings.js
1167 ms
forms-elemets.js
1183 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1157 ms
browser_detection.js
1070 ms
infinigrid_new.js
1189 ms
hform.js
1162 ms
validate.js
1047 ms
nv.d3.css
841 ms
font-awesome.min.css
834 ms
fontello.css
898 ms
bgnoise_lg_dark.png
159 ms
logo_trasp.png
242 ms
logo_mobile.png
200 ms
01-mani.jpg
321 ms
02-Orchestra.png
960 ms
03-tastiera.png
650 ms
04-Ligoratti.png
798 ms
05-Orchestra.png
1192 ms
06-violino.png
598 ms
06%20-Margherita%20.png
1311 ms
07-Orchestra.png
943 ms
facebook.png
803 ms
twitter.png
945 ms
linkedin.png
957 ms
youtube.png
1085 ms
logo1.png
1088 ms
logo2.png
1089 ms
ajs.php
1577 ms
ajs.php
208 ms
open-sans.woff
163 ms
open-sans-light.woff
168 ms
open-sans-semibold.woff
160 ms
open-sans-bold.woff
161 ms
fontello.woff
167 ms
open-sans-italic.woff
297 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
417 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
414 ms
cc076017a126d41ae2ef45b384b106d7.jpg
782 ms
lg.php
1109 ms
300lo.json
89 ms
counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js
15 ms
overlay.png
146 ms
controls.png
149 ms
border.png
155 ms
loading_background.png
154 ms
loading.gif
160 ms
themes.gif
129 ms
sprite.png
266 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
61 ms
shares.json
50 ms
pixel
17 ms
pixel
15 ms
classicaviva.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
classicaviva.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
classicaviva.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicaviva.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Classicaviva.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
classicaviva.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classicaviva. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: