2.5 sec in total
371 ms
2 sec
182 ms
Welcome to classicbikeforum.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Classicbikeforum best content right away, or after learning these important things about classicbikeforum.co.uk
Visit classicbikeforum.co.ukWe analyzed Classicbikeforum.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 371 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
classicbikeforum.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
371 ms
73 ms
135 ms
422 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Classicbikeforum.co.uk, 9% (3 requests) were made to Paypal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Classicbikeforum.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 51.5 kB (55%)
94.5 kB
43.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Classicbikeforum.co.uk main page is 94.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 32.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classicbikeforum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicbikeforum.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (79%)
33
7
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classicbikeforum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
classicbikeforum.co.uk
371 ms
styleswitcher.js
73 ms
forum_fn.js
135 ms
style.php
422 ms
gallery.css
141 ms
normal.css
140 ms
prettyPhoto.css
202 ms
btn_donate_SM.gif
61 ms
logo.png
137 ms
icon_topic_latest.gif
74 ms
icon_e_smile.gif
75 ms
cron.php
1244 ms
pixel.gif
44 ms
btn_donate_SM.gif
19 ms
bg_header.gif
74 ms
corners_left.png
73 ms
corners_right.png
72 ms
icon_textbox_search.gif
74 ms
bg_button.gif
73 ms
icon_home.gif
144 ms
gallery_icon.png
146 ms
icon_fontsize.gif
143 ms
icon_faq.gif
143 ms
icon_register.gif
141 ms
icon_logout.gif
212 ms
bg_list.gif
213 ms
gradient.gif
212 ms
forum_unread.gif
231 ms
forum_unread_subforum.gif
212 ms
subforum_unread.gif
280 ms
subforum_read.gif
280 ms
print.css
72 ms
medium.css
71 ms
large.css
71 ms
classicbikeforum.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
classicbikeforum.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
classicbikeforum.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
SK
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicbikeforum.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Slovak is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Classicbikeforum.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
classicbikeforum.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classicbikeforum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: