Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

clean.email

Clean Email Inbox – Organize and remove emails you don't need

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

177 ms

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

clean.email screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Clean content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clean.email

Clean and organize your messy mailbox with a bulk email cleaner app - Clean Email. Choose your email provider to start cleaning.

Visit clean.email

Key Findings

We analyzed Clean.email page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clean.email performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clean.email

34 ms

clean.email

20 ms

proxima-nova-condensed

37 ms

85eae6bf23a1f08bd43e37f6376b2efc.js

13 ms

jquery.min.js

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Clean.email, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.cdnfonts.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (44 ms) belongs to the original domain Clean.email.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.9 kB (46%)

Content Size

140.1 kB

After Optimization

75.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Clean.email main page is 140.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 80.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 63.1 kB

  • Original 80.9 kB
  • After minification 80.9 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.8 kB
  • After minification 7.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clean images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 47.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 22 B

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clean.email has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (17%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clean. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

clean.email accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

clean.email best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

clean.email SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clean.email can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clean.email main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clean. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: