4.4 sec in total
178 ms
3.6 sec
567 ms
Visit clearchoicesa.com now to see the best up-to-date Clearchoicesa content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about clearchoicesa.com
Clear Choice Remodeling offers professional kitchen design and bathroom design in San Antonio. Click here to learn more.
Visit clearchoicesa.comWe analyzed Clearchoicesa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
clearchoicesa.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.2 s
0/100
10%
Value17.5 s
0/100
25%
Value19.6 s
0/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
178 ms
329 ms
376 ms
20 ms
397 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Clearchoicesa.com, 25% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Clearchoicesa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 95.7 kB (4%)
2.5 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Clearchoicesa.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clearchoicesa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clearchoicesa.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (77%)
61
14
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clearchoicesa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
clearchoicesa.com
178 ms
www.clearchoicesa.com
329 ms
style-blocks.build.css
376 ms
style.min.css
20 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
397 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
399 ms
views-frontend.css
511 ms
style.min.css
435 ms
theme.min.css
507 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
383 ms
post-5.css
399 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
744 ms
swiper.min.css
775 ms
frontend.min.css
419 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
773 ms
global.css
769 ms
post-7.css
870 ms
post-12.css
885 ms
post-704.css
1049 ms
general.min.css
1091 ms
css
39 ms
fontawesome.min.css
784 ms
brands.min.css
1083 ms
toolset-common-es-frontend.js
795 ms
jquery.min.js
806 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
817 ms
js
66 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
1247 ms
widget-call-to-action.min.css
1251 ms
animations.min.css
1249 ms
dismiss.js
1421 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1478 ms
general.min.js
1248 ms
frontend.min.js
1324 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1314 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1248 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1509 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1555 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1316 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1313 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1343 ms
hooks.min.js
978 ms
i18n.min.js
999 ms
frontend.min.js
1002 ms
waypoints.min.js
1008 ms
core.min.js
991 ms
frontend.min.js
995 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1228 ms
tooltipster.min.js
931 ms
hotjar-3869304.js
210 ms
logo.png
626 ms
header_dvdr.png
693 ms
BENITEZ_1210_705.jpg
785 ms
FOLEY_1210_705-1.jpg
937 ms
W3A3834_Vantage_Alamo-Ranch.jpg
1459 ms
W3A0485-scaled.jpg
1156 ms
nav_rptr.jpg
956 ms
home_mid_rptr.jpg
1078 ms
testimonial_bg.jpg
1126 ms
PRADO-BEFORE-qczowdoduyhy762q2z8vfymvvimgf4qdl2myz3pv9k.jpg
1350 ms
PRADO-AFTER-qczowspswb2jcxgvn5qwjuu9dokbuae2z52qnj3ki0.jpg
1422 ms
Bryant-Living-Space-Remodel.jpg
948 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
69 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
76 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
92 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
101 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
102 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
101 ms
pe0xMJCbPYBVokB1LHA9bbyaQb8ZGjc4VYF466c.ttf
175 ms
pe0-MJCbPYBVokB1LHA9bbyaQb8ZGjc4VYnDzrfb-V8.ttf
154 ms
pe0zMJCbPYBVokB1LHA9bbyaQb8ZGjc4ULF_.ttf
131 ms
pe0wMJCbPYBVokB1LHA9bbyaQb8ZGjcw65RvzIfc.ttf
100 ms
eicons.woff
1386 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
101 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDXbtY.ttf
119 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebunDXbtY.ttf
119 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf
121 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDXbtY.ttf
121 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtY.ttf
119 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_A.ttf
121 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_pqTXtHA_A.ttf
148 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_naUXtHA_A.ttf
122 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_k-UXtHA_A.ttf
121 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_iiUXtHA_A.ttf
149 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_gGUXtHA_A.ttf
149 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1384 ms
modules.3ba69200791f16077ba8.js
25 ms
clearchoicesa.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
clearchoicesa.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
clearchoicesa.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clearchoicesa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clearchoicesa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clearchoicesa.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clearchoicesa. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: