Tools & Wizards About Us
clickasnap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

clickasnap.com

ClickASnap - Share Your Creativity, Get Paid for It | ClickASnap

Page Load Speed

258 ms in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

201 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

clickasnap.com screenshot

About Website

Visit clickasnap.com now to see the best up-to-date ClickA Snap content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about clickasnap.com

Join ClickASnap, the best online photo-sharing platform that pays you for every view your photos receive. Share your creativity and earn today.

Visit clickasnap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clickasnap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 201 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clickasnap.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clickasnap.com

57 ms

www.clickasnap.com

44 ms

bootstrap-grid.css

12 ms

client

96 ms

main.ce75e625.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Clickasnap.com, 17% (1 request) were made to Accounts.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (96 ms) relates to the external source Accounts.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.2 kB (1%)

Content Size

381.9 kB

After Optimization

377.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clickasnap.com main page is 381.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 360.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 360.9 kB
  • After minification 360.9 kB
  • After compression 360.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 732 B

  • Original 15.7 kB
  • After minification 15.7 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clickasnap.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ClickA Snap. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

clickasnap.com

clickasnap.com

57 ms

www.clickasnap.com

www.clickasnap.com

44 ms

bootstrap-grid.css

bootstrap-grid.css

12 ms

client

client

96 ms

main.ce75e625.js

main.ce75e625.js

46 ms

main.b2c93387.css

main.b2c93387.css

34 ms

Accessibility Review

clickasnap.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

SEO Factors

clickasnap.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clickasnap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clickasnap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clickasnap.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ClickA Snap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: