5.4 sec in total
198 ms
4.4 sec
817 ms
Click here to check amazing Clifox content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clifox.com
Clifox.com - A great place to buy laptops, desktops, computer parts, electronics, ... fast shipping, and top-rated customer service - once you know, you Clifox.
Visit clifox.comWe analyzed Clifox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
clifox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value12.8 s
2/100
10%
Value3,530 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.122
84/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
198 ms
2082 ms
34 ms
86 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Clifox.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Clifox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 169.3 kB (14%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Clifox.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 912.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.5 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clifox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clifox.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (50%)
94
47
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clifox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
clifox.com
198 ms
www.clifox.com
2082 ms
css
34 ms
j-strap.css
86 ms
font-awesome.min.css
181 ms
jquery-ui-slider.min.css
144 ms
owl.carousel.css
121 ms
owl.transitions.css
133 ms
magnific-popup.css
133 ms
settings.css
169 ms
hint.min.css
194 ms
journal.css
186 ms
features.css
191 ms
header.css
195 ms
module.css
266 ms
pages.css
232 ms
account.css
242 ms
blog-manager.css
247 ms
side-column.css
285 ms
product.css
260 ms
category.css
293 ms
footer.css
306 ms
icons.css
304 ms
responsive.css
321 ms
index.php
502 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
354 ms
bootstrap.min.js
360 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
366 ms
jquery-ui-slider.min.js
359 ms
common.js
374 ms
jquery.total-storage.min.js
413 ms
tabs.js
418 ms
owl.carousel.js
423 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
433 ms
jquery.actual.min.js
433 ms
jquery.countdown.js
468 ms
jquery.imagezoom.min.js
600 ms
jquery.lazy.1.6.min.js
476 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
595 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
535 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
534 ms
jquery.isotope.sloppy-masonry.min.js
521 ms
journal.js
514 ms
jquery.swipebox.js
515 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
480 ms
jquery.pnotify.min.js
479 ms
jquery.autocomplete2.min.js
466 ms
respond.js
500 ms
jquery.sticky.js
505 ms
init.js
497 ms
index.php
590 ms
logo-200x100.png
72 ms
no_image-250x250.png
70 ms
unnamed.jpg
128 ms
1.jpg
134 ms
2.jpg
136 ms
3.jpg
136 ms
transparent-980x400.png
131 ms
banner-adata-300x300.jpg
129 ms
mzvpv256hdglbanner-500x500.jpg
176 ms
i7logo-500x500.jpg
212 ms
transparent-250x250.png
175 ms
be83f14ccd8c94d571c17740e03eb6c9--medium--255-255-255--235-88-88.png
176 ms
journal-icons.svg
249 ms
journal-icons.woff
130 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
15 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
76 ms
unnamed.jpg
172 ms
1.jpg
81 ms
2.jpg
79 ms
3.jpg
165 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
14 ms
HP_New_Logo_2D-250x250.png
399 ms
Crucial-Logo-250x250.jpg
392 ms
targus-250x250.gif
394 ms
samsung-logo-250x250.jpeg
395 ms
adata-logo-250x250.jpg
390 ms
intel-250x250.jpg
392 ms
loader.gif
75 ms
coloredbg.png
83 ms
Crucial-banner-1200x500.jpg
383 ms
hp-logo--250x250.png
59 ms
apple%20logo-250x250.png
287 ms
windows%20logo-250x250.png
287 ms
keyboard-mouse-250x250.jpg
70 ms
laptop-accessories-1-250x250.jpg
71 ms
Bagpacks-250x250.jpg
123 ms
Monitor-250x250.jpg
130 ms
printer-icon-250x250.jpg
155 ms
antivirus-250x250.jpg
286 ms
Office%20Logo-250x250.jpg
283 ms
winlogo-250x250.jpg
284 ms
Server%20software-250x250.png
488 ms
External%20HDD-250x250.jpg
285 ms
hard%20disk%20drive-250x250.jpg
300 ms
motherboard-250x250.jpg
303 ms
Processor-250x250.jpg
408 ms
RAM-250x250.jpg
378 ms
SSD-250x250.jpg
405 ms
H2C21AA-250x250.jpg
64 ms
3LJ57AA%20(2)-250x250.jpg
62 ms
W3Z70PA-250x250.jpg
124 ms
1AM57AA%20(1)-250x250.jpg
71 ms
CRUCIAL%2016GB-250x250.jpg
71 ms
clifox.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
clifox.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
clifox.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clifox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clifox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clifox.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clifox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: