Tools & Wizards About Us
clippingline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

clippingline.com

clippingline.com – Just another WordPress site

Page Load Speed

866 ms in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

512 ms

Page Rendered

149 ms

clippingline.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Clippingline content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clippingline.com

ClippingLine, a best clipping path, image retouch, photo masking and other graphics service provider company.

Visit clippingline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clippingline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 661 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clippingline.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.clippingline.com

205 ms

bootstrap.css

37 ms

style.css

27 ms

css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Clippingline.com, 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (205 ms) belongs to the original domain Clippingline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 384.3 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clippingline.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 19.8 kB
  • After minification 16.2 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clippingline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 200.4 kB

  • Original 316.7 kB
  • After minification 306.5 kB
  • After compression 116.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 200.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 150.7 kB

  • Original 176.3 kB
  • After minification 143.7 kB
  • After compression 25.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clippingline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clippingline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.clippingline.com

www.clippingline.com

205 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

css

css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

51 ms

slider.css

slider.css

32 ms

modernizr.custom.28468.js

modernizr.custom.28468.js

33 ms

jquery.cslider.js

jquery.cslider.js

34 ms

jquery.openCarousel.js

jquery.openCarousel.js

48 ms

image-hover.css

image-hover.css

49 ms

jquery.adipoli.min.js

jquery.adipoli.min.js

49 ms

swipebox.css

swipebox.css

50 ms

ios-orientationchange-fix.js

ios-orientationchange-fix.js

49 ms

jquery.swipebox.min.js

jquery.swipebox.min.js

62 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

63 ms

styles.css

styles.css

73 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

74 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

73 ms

nav.js

nav.js

73 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

74 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

73 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

62 ms

ga.js

ga.js

38 ms

CL-logo.jpg

CL-logo.jpg

34 ms

Clippingline-BAG.png

Clippingline-BAG.png

50 ms

Clippingline-R.png

Clippingline-R.png

46 ms

neck-joint2.png

neck-joint2.png

48 ms

Clippingline-multipath.png

Clippingline-multipath.png

52 ms

Hair-mask-FF.png

Hair-mask-FF.png

53 ms

Clippingpath-Baby-CL.png

Clippingpath-Baby-CL.png

47 ms

Clippingline-cycle-F.png

Clippingline-cycle-F.png

47 ms

img-sprite.png

img-sprite.png

50 ms

d11.png

d11.png

51 ms

9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff

9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff

32 ms

KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff

KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff

33 ms

boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff

boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff

33 ms

wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff

wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff

33 ms

BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff

BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff

34 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

17 ms

SEO Factors

clippingline.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clippingline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Clippingline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clippingline.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clippingline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: