Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

clippingpathsuccess.com

Clipping Path Services Provider | Background Removal Services

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

clippingpathsuccess.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to clippingpathsuccess.com homepage info - get ready to check Clipping Path Success best content for Bangladesh right away, or after learning these important things about clippingpathsuccess.com

We are clipping path services provider. We provide professional clipping path services, background removal services, cut out image background service at a reasonable price. Get our free trial today.

Visit clippingpathsuccess.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clippingpathsuccess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clippingpathsuccess.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,160 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clippingpathsuccess.com

172 ms

clippingpathsuccess.com

448 ms

autoptimize_52b0a4d3ae6106cbafecd6b92b542fe4.css

781 ms

css

49 ms

autoptimize_single_e6daed87457855b72b7fd8f4eb35c69c.css

342 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Clippingpathsuccess.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Clippingpathsuccess.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 432.6 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Clippingpathsuccess.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 156.5 kB

  • Original 183.5 kB
  • After minification 183.4 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 175.9 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clipping Path Success images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 30.4 kB

  • Original 204.3 kB
  • After minification 204.2 kB
  • After compression 173.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 69.8 kB

  • Original 284.1 kB
  • After minification 284.1 kB
  • After compression 214.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clippingpathsuccess.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (63%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clipping Path Success. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

clippingpathsuccess.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

clippingpathsuccess.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

clippingpathsuccess.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clippingpathsuccess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clippingpathsuccess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clipping Path Success. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: