Tools & Wizards About Us
closetcare.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

closetcare.in

Dry Cleaners Nearby | Laundry Services in Mumbai | Closet Care

Page Load Speed

991 ms in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

583 ms

Page Rendered

356 ms

closetcare.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to closetcare.in homepage info - get ready to check Closet Care best content right away, or after learning these important things about closetcare.in

Are you looking for dry cleaners nearby? Closet Care is the best laundry services in Mumbai offers dry cleaning, shoe laundry, sofa and carpet cleaning services.

Visit closetcare.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Closetcare.in page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 939 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

closetcare.in performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

closetcare.in

52 ms

closetcare.in

128 ms

stylemodal.css

49 ms

bootstrap.min.css

109 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Closetcare.in, 6% (3 requests) were made to Formden.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (281 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 499.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

540.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Closetcare.in main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 381.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 43.4 kB

  • Original 51.7 kB
  • After minification 36.5 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.2 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16.1 kB

  • Original 381.8 kB
  • After minification 365.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Closet Care images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 244.8 kB

  • Original 354.9 kB
  • After minification 338.7 kB
  • After compression 110.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 244.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 194.8 kB

  • Original 250.7 kB
  • After minification 225.5 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Closetcare.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 194.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (38%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Closet Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

closetcare.in

closetcare.in

52 ms

closetcare.in

closetcare.in

128 ms

stylemodal.css

stylemodal.css

49 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

109 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.css

bootstrap-datepicker.css

77 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.css.map

bootstrap-datepicker.css.map

78 ms

bootstrap-datepicker3.css

bootstrap-datepicker3.css

76 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.standalone.css

bootstrap-datepicker.standalone.css

66 ms

bootstrap-datepicker3.standalone.css

bootstrap-datepicker3.standalone.css

64 ms

bootstrap-datepicker3.css

bootstrap-datepicker3.css

23 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

34 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

16 ms

formden.js

formden.js

59 ms

bootstrap-iso.css

bootstrap-iso.css

76 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

115 ms

endpoints.js

endpoints.js

52 ms

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

68 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

78 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

134 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

34 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

95 ms

embed

embed

281 ms

closet-care-logo.png

closet-care-logo.png

69 ms

whatsapp-icon.png

whatsapp-icon.png

68 ms

phone.png

phone.png

69 ms

Banner-1-1.jpg

Banner-1-1.jpg

122 ms

Button-1.png

Button-1.png

67 ms

Button-2-1.png

Button-2-1.png

68 ms

B2-1.png

B2-1.png

83 ms

B2-2.png

B2-2.png

85 ms

B2-7.png

B2-7.png

85 ms

B2-3.png

B2-3.png

84 ms

B2-4.png

B2-4.png

84 ms

B2-5.png

B2-5.png

122 ms

B2-6.png

B2-6.png

121 ms

B2-8.png

B2-8.png

121 ms

B3-1.png

B3-1.png

121 ms

B3-2.png

B3-2.png

121 ms

B3-3.png

B3-3.png

122 ms

B3-4.png

B3-4.png

122 ms

B3-5.png

B3-5.png

123 ms

B3-6.png

B3-6.png

123 ms

pricetop.png

pricetop.png

124 ms

pricebottom.png

pricebottom.png

124 ms

Banner-4-2.png

Banner-4-2.png

130 ms

Price-3.png

Price-3.png

131 ms

BOT-2.png

BOT-2.png

130 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

81 ms

Banner-2-2.jpg

Banner-2-2.jpg

76 ms

Banner-3-3.png

Banner-3-3.png

76 ms

Price-Back-1.png

Price-Back-1.png

90 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

js

js

59 ms

js

js

33 ms

Accessibility Review

closetcare.in accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

closetcare.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

closetcare.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Closetcare.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Closetcare.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

closetcare.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Closet Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: