Tools & Wizards About Us
closetorganizersct.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

closetorganizersct.com

Connecticut Closet Organizers | Custom Closets | Garage Organization

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

20 ms

Resources Loaded

471 ms

Page Rendered

667 ms

closetorganizersct.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Closet Organizers Ct content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about closetorganizersct.com

Get a Free closet design from Hang It Up Closets, the custom closet organizers in Connecticut. We have organization systems for any size closet or budget. We service the entire state of Connecticut. A...

Visit closetorganizersct.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Closetorganizersct.com page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

closetorganizersct.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

closetorganizersct.com

20 ms

www.closetorganizersct.com

23 ms

www.hangitupclosets.com

127 ms

gtm.js

154 ms

hang-it-up-closets-connecticut.svg

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Closetorganizersct.com, 38% (6 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 25% (4 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (310 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.9 kB (32%)

Content Size

394.3 kB

After Optimization

268.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Closetorganizersct.com main page is 394.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 162.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 125.8 kB

  • Original 162.1 kB
  • After minification 157.9 kB
  • After compression 36.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 102.4 kB
  • After minification 102.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Closet Organizers Ct images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 109 B

  • Original 129.8 kB
  • After minification 129.8 kB
  • After compression 129.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (33%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Closet Organizers Ct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

closetorganizersct.com

closetorganizersct.com

20 ms

www.closetorganizersct.com

www.closetorganizersct.com

23 ms

www.hangitupclosets.com

www.hangitupclosets.com

127 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

154 ms

hang-it-up-closets-connecticut.svg

hang-it-up-closets-connecticut.svg

158 ms

custom-closet-home-storage-systems-dallas-1920w.jpg

custom-closet-home-storage-systems-dallas-1920w.jpg

310 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

88 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

100 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

86 ms

swap.js

swap.js

107 ms

arctic-custom-walk-in-closet-1920w.jpg

arctic-custom-walk-in-closet-1920w.jpg

269 ms

custom-closet-before-500px-1920w.jpg

custom-closet-before-500px-1920w.jpg

164 ms

custom-closet-after-500px-1920w.jpg

custom-closet-after-500px-1920w.jpg

165 ms

cg-3d-closet-design-software-672w.png

cg-3d-closet-design-software-672w.png

301 ms

cg-3d-closet-design-software-1920w.png

cg-3d-closet-design-software-1920w.png

266 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

closetorganizersct.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

closetorganizersct.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

closetorganizersct.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Closetorganizersct.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Closetorganizersct.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

closetorganizersct.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Closet Organizers Ct. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: