Tools & Wizards About Us
cnta.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

cnta.cc

旅游保险&旅游联盟旗下唯一提供品质保障服务的中国旅游保险网www.cnta.cc

Page Load Speed

10.2 sec in total

First Response

374 ms

Resources Loaded

9.7 sec

Page Rendered

119 ms

cnta.cc screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cnta.cc homepage info - get ready to check Cnta best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about cnta.cc

旅游保险,联盟旅游保险网是旅游联盟旗下唯一提供品质保障服务的中国旅游保险网 .为中国太平洋保险集团财产保险公司提供专业旅游保险产品入口.专业为您提供旅游品质保障服务:旅游咨询,旅游攻略,质监公告,旅游质量投诉协助处理等,是目前唯一全国旅游城市旅游质监投诉对话受理平台

Visit cnta.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Cnta.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 374 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cnta.cc performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

75/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cnta.cc

374 ms

558 ms

engine.js

2048 ms

Tools.js

557 ms

util.js

932 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Cnta.cc and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cnta.cc.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.2 kB (75%)

Content Size

73.5 kB

After Optimization

18.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cnta.cc main page is 73.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 59.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 59.0 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (19%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cnta. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cnta.cc

cnta.cc

374 ms

558 ms

engine.js

engine.js

2048 ms

Tools.js

Tools.js

557 ms

util.js

util.js

932 ms

validate.js

validate.js

620 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2077 ms

layer.js

layer.js

1061 ms

__System.pageLoaded.dwr

__System.pageLoaded.dwr

505 ms

layer.css

layer.css

215 ms

13.png

13.png

213 ms

12.png

12.png

187 ms

15.png

15.png

187 ms

16.png

16.png

619 ms

jna.png

jna.png

621 ms

jnb.png

jnb.png

372 ms

jnc.png

jnc.png

1522 ms

jnd.png

jnd.png

1431 ms

jne.png

jne.png

598 ms

jnf.png

jnf.png

558 ms

17.png

17.png

1863 ms

jwa.png

jwa.png

968 ms

jwb.png

jwb.png

825 ms

jwc.png

jwc.png

2221 ms

jwd.png

jwd.png

1032 ms

jwe.png

jwe.png

1155 ms

18.png

18.png

4984 ms

username.png

username.png

1340 ms

pwd.png

pwd.png

1526 ms

login_but.png

login_but.png

1897 ms

reset_but.png

reset_but.png

1892 ms

cktb.png

cktb.png

1712 ms

wcktb.png

wcktb.png

1898 ms

Accessibility Review

cnta.cc accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cnta.cc best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cnta.cc SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cnta.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cnta.cc main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

cnta.cc

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cnta. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: