14 sec in total
2.8 sec
10.8 sec
350 ms
Welcome to co-plan.net homepage info - get ready to check Co Plan best content right away, or after learning these important things about co-plan.net
Visit co-plan.netWe analyzed Co-plan.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
co-plan.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value2,590 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value29.0 s
0/100
10%
2834 ms
143 ms
150 ms
152 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Co-plan.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Img.baidu.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.3 sec) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.
Page size can be reduced by 204.2 kB (23%)
898.6 kB
694.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Co-plan.net main page is 898.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 848.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Co Plan needs image optimization as it can save up to 163.3 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Co-plan.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (8%)
52
48
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Co Plan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
co-plan.net
2834 ms
main.css
143 ms
func.js
150 ms
fun.js
152 ms
gotan.js
152 ms
bg.jpg
74 ms
logo.gif
321 ms
top_menu_01.jpg
113 ms
top_menu_04.jpg
112 ms
top_menu_03.jpg
139 ms
top_menu_02.jpg
149 ms
top_menu_05.jpg
156 ms
down2.gif
236 ms
top_menu_08.jpg
226 ms
1_01.gif
226 ms
1_02.gif
228 ms
1_03.gif
249 ms
1_04.jpg
500 ms
7.jpg
583 ms
1_06.gif
317 ms
mb_23.gif
399 ms
mb_08.gif
338 ms
1.jpg
452 ms
ChatButton.gif
385 ms
2.jpg
611 ms
3.jpg
595 ms
4.jpg
532 ms
17.jpg
529 ms
5.jpg
632 ms
6.jpg
671 ms
8.jpg
600 ms
18.jpg
649 ms
9.jpg
669 ms
10.jpg
669 ms
11.jpg
745 ms
12.jpg
699 ms
19.jpg
714 ms
13.jpg
741 ms
14.jpg
747 ms
15.jpg
747 ms
16.jpg
702 ms
push_18.jpg
677 ms
bgbt.gif
722 ms
shexiangtou.gif
697 ms
46.jpg
630 ms
39.jpg
630 ms
logo-80px.gif
1010 ms
tj.js
636 ms
27.jpg
641 ms
40.jpg
685 ms
33.jpg
757 ms
34.jpg
690 ms
53.jpg
675 ms
73.jpg
612 ms
35.jpg
618 ms
36.jpg
645 ms
43.jpg
615 ms
13-1.jpg
601 ms
63.jpg
544 ms
bg-article.jpg
505 ms
18771338.js
7308 ms
co-plan.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
co-plan.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
co-plan.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
ZH
N/A
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Co-plan.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Co-plan.net main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
co-plan.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Co Plan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: