Tools & Wizards About Us
cockneyrejects.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cockneyrejects.com

Cockney Rejects | Punk Rock Band

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

53 ms

cockneyrejects.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cockneyrejects.com now to see the best up-to-date Cockney Rejects content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cockneyrejects.com

The only official Cockney Rejects site on the web. One of the UK longest lasting and premier punk rock bands.

Visit cockneyrejects.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cockneyrejects.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cockneyrejects.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cockneyrejects.com

56 ms

minified.js

28 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

55 ms

polyfill.min.js

59 ms

thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cockneyrejects.com, 41% (23 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 30% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (894 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 661.6 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

615.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cockneyrejects.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 805.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 641.5 kB

  • Original 805.2 kB
  • After minification 803.5 kB
  • After compression 163.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 641.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

  • Original 226.7 kB
  • After minification 210.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cockney Rejects images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 245.0 kB
  • After minification 244.9 kB
  • After compression 240.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (26%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cockney Rejects. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cockneyrejects.com

www.cockneyrejects.com

56 ms

minified.js

minified.js

28 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

55 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

59 ms

thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js

100 ms

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

100 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

99 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

102 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

99 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

102 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

101 ms

1c6c54_bd3489a125794d17b5810fa90c6edcfd~mv2.png

1c6c54_bd3489a125794d17b5810fa90c6edcfd~mv2.png

230 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

55 ms

image.png

image.png

166 ms

1c6c54_add68b1822c649ab9a8db39bfbde0f15~mv2.jpg

1c6c54_add68b1822c649ab9a8db39bfbde0f15~mv2.jpg

198 ms

Jeffro_edited.jpg

Jeffro_edited.jpg

183 ms

100%20CLUB%202024.jpg

100%20CLUB%202024.jpg

166 ms

Powergrab.jpg

Powergrab.jpg

198 ms

cadizlp275.jpg

cadizlp275.jpg

327 ms

RejectsNew1.jpg

RejectsNew1.jpg

347 ms

NewLineUp1.jpg

NewLineUp1.jpg

362 ms

cadizlp275.jpg

cadizlp275.jpg

324 ms

Powergrab.jpg

Powergrab.jpg

298 ms

BubblesSideA.jpg

BubblesSideA.jpg

476 ms

1c6c54_a3401015436c4b1d97e6e89eca1818ff~mv2_d_2210_2246_s_2.jpg

1c6c54_a3401015436c4b1d97e6e89eca1818ff~mv2_d_2210_2246_s_2.jpg

718 ms

1c6c54_2eb11d7f4dbd4622b36e98c4c4a07e0b~mv2_d_2210_2246_s_2.jpg

1c6c54_2eb11d7f4dbd4622b36e98c4c4a07e0b~mv2_d_2210_2246_s_2.jpg

656 ms

1c6c54_6deda996844c42379c097b27f19ede4f~mv2_d_3168_2156_s_2.jpg

1c6c54_6deda996844c42379c097b27f19ede4f~mv2_d_3168_2156_s_2.jpg

655 ms

East%20End%20Babylong%20LP.png

East%20End%20Babylong%20LP.png

499 ms

1c6c54_1e397b594fd743a88a02ed484766cb46~mv2.jpg

1c6c54_1e397b594fd743a88a02ed484766cb46~mv2.jpg

557 ms

cadizcd121_JPG.jpg

cadizcd121_JPG.jpg

693 ms

cadizcd157.jpg

cadizcd157.jpg

671 ms

cadizcd115_JPG.jpg

cadizcd115_JPG.jpg

721 ms

1c6c54_e38ae5ebf9b2459cac533daf894058e7~mv2.jpg

1c6c54_e38ae5ebf9b2459cac533daf894058e7~mv2.jpg

805 ms

RejectsSigned.jpg

RejectsSigned.jpg

894 ms

1c6c54_bd3489a125794d17b5810fa90c6edcfd~mv2.png

1c6c54_bd3489a125794d17b5810fa90c6edcfd~mv2.png

778 ms

105 ms

105 ms

103 ms

103 ms

102 ms

100 ms

131 ms

128 ms

129 ms

128 ms

124 ms

125 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

8 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

8 ms

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

8 ms

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

8 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

20 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

4 ms

Accessibility Review

cockneyrejects.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cockneyrejects.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cockneyrejects.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cockneyrejects.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cockneyrejects.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cockneyrejects.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cockney Rejects. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: