Tools & Wizards About Us
cocodesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

cocodesign.com

Coco Design | National Award Winning Website Design & Marketing in Pensacola, Fl

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

602 ms

cocodesign.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cocodesign.com now to see the best up-to-date Coco Design content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cocodesign.com

We offer responsive web design, search engine marketing (SEM), search engine opitimzation (SEO) & internet marketing. We are located in Pensacola, Florida.

Visit cocodesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cocodesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cocodesign.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value43.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.181

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cocodesign.com

77 ms

www.cocodesign.com

929 ms

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

75 ms

settings.css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Cocodesign.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cocodesign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.3 kB (1%)

Content Size

9.4 MB

After Optimization

9.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cocodesign.com main page is 9.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 9.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 35.6 kB
  • After minification 30.8 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

  • Original 9.0 MB
  • After minification 8.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coco Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 221.5 kB
  • After minification 221.5 kB
  • After compression 219.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 332 B

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 83.9 kB
  • After compression 83.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cocodesign.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (73%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coco Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cocodesign.com

cocodesign.com

77 ms

www.cocodesign.com

www.cocodesign.com

929 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

75 ms

settings.css

settings.css

70 ms

layers.css

layers.css

61 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

24 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

green.css

green.css

46 ms

coco_logo_green.png

coco_logo_green.png

47 ms

web-design-wallpaper-flipped.jpg

web-design-wallpaper-flipped.jpg

50 ms

computer_3.png

computer_3.png

55 ms

wireframe-icon.png

wireframe-icon.png

65 ms

design-icon.png

design-icon.png

58 ms

programming-icon.png

programming-icon.png

60 ms

marketing-icon.png

marketing-icon.png

86 ms

coco_portoflio_example.png

coco_portoflio_example.png

61 ms

coco_building.png

coco_building.png

63 ms

ccufl.png

ccufl.png

82 ms

grocery.png

grocery.png

84 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

62 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

67 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.min.js

jquery.easing-1.3.min.js

66 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

68 ms

fm.checkator.jquery.js

fm.checkator.jquery.js

74 ms

setting.js

setting.js

79 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

76 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

82 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

88 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

119 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

89 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

129 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

121 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

91 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

100 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

112 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

105 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

103 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

103 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

91 ms

overwrite.css

overwrite.css

97 ms

animate.css

animate.css

95 ms

masonry.css

masonry.css

133 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

129 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

84 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

84 ms

prettify.css

prettify.css

116 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

86 ms

datetimepicker.css

datetimepicker.css

87 ms

vegas.css

vegas.css

87 ms

slider.css

slider.css

91 ms

setting.js

setting.js

92 ms

prettify.js

prettify.js

93 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

96 ms

setting.js

setting.js

98 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

98 ms

setting.js

setting.js

100 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

99 ms

masonry.filter.js

masonry.filter.js

119 ms

setting.js

setting.js

115 ms

jcf.js

jcf.js

132 ms

jcf.scrollable.js

jcf.scrollable.js

141 ms

jcf.select.js

jcf.select.js

114 ms

jquery.datetimepicker.min.js

jquery.datetimepicker.min.js

133 ms

setting.js

setting.js

108 ms

ticker.js

ticker.js

107 ms

tweecool.js

tweecool.js

103 ms

setting.js

setting.js

95 ms

custom.js

custom.js

99 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

88 ms

covid_image_article.png

covid_image_article.png

94 ms

covid_image.jpg

covid_image.jpg

91 ms

computer_cover.jpg

computer_cover.jpg

91 ms

programming_cover.jpg

programming_cover.jpg

98 ms

EdwardKiddcover.jpg

EdwardKiddcover.jpg

96 ms

blount_cover.jpg

blount_cover.jpg

167 ms

placeholder_1920x1090.png

placeholder_1920x1090.png

108 ms

placeholder_1920-1278.png

placeholder_1920-1278.png

110 ms

section-heading-line.png

section-heading-line.png

107 ms

main.js

main.js

8 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

1226 ms

opensans-light-webfont.woff

opensans-light-webfont.woff

70 ms

opensans-semibold-webfont.woff

opensans-semibold-webfont.woff

548 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

47 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

202 ms

js

js

57 ms

ie-emulation-modes-warning.js

ie-emulation-modes-warning.js

20 ms

sharethis.js

sharethis.js

16 ms

widget.js

widget.js

172 ms

js

js

37 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

Accessibility Review

cocodesign.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

cocodesign.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cocodesign.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cocodesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cocodesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cocodesign.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coco Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: