6.8 sec in total
880 ms
3.1 sec
2.8 sec
Visit codefromjames.com now to see the best up-to-date Codefrom James content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codefromjames.com
Visit codefromjames.comWe analyzed Codefromjames.com page load time and found that the first response time was 880 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
codefromjames.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
880 ms
235 ms
152 ms
161 ms
173 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Codefromjames.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Paypal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Codefromjames.com.
Page size can be reduced by 278.6 kB (27%)
1.0 MB
742.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Codefromjames.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 754.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Codefrom James needs image optimization as it can save up to 99.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 79.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codefromjames.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (30%)
54
38
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codefrom James. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
880 ms
style.css
235 ms
objc.css
152 ms
csharp.css
161 ms
bash.css
173 ms
jquery.js
612 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
266 ms
wp-synhighlighter.css
253 ms
wp-synhighlighter.js
253 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
127 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
229 ms
path.jpg
236 ms
icon_minus.gif
229 ms
code.png
226 ms
printer.png
229 ms
info.gif
224 ms
trace_constant.png
233 ms
bob.jpg
285 ms
frownie.png
232 ms
configuration_manager.png
305 ms
new_configuration.png
319 ms
new_configuration2.png
318 ms
selecting_configuration.png
366 ms
output_constant.png
321 ms
output_window.png
372 ms
output_options.png
613 ms
Logo.png
502 ms
mono.png
457 ms
tdsm.png
607 ms
sharp-proxy-port.png
494 ms
dot-net-port.png
443 ms
kalidity-128.png
559 ms
kalidity_web_player-300x245.jpg
642 ms
kalidity_general_search-252x300.jpg
615 ms
kalidity_discover_box-283x300.jpg
576 ms
kalidity_on_iphone_library-181x300.jpg
623 ms
todo_screenshot-300x217.png
678 ms
ctm_new-284x300.png
801 ms
ctm_main-300x154.png
786 ms
ctm_details-300x231.png
818 ms
ctm_options.png
708 ms
ctm_alerts-300x154.png
809 ms
pvz_zen_madness.jpg
1053 ms
wtf_req-300x187.jpg
780 ms
wtf_req2-300x187.jpg
892 ms
wtf_req3-300x187.jpg
869 ms
pixel.gif
210 ms
ca-pub-0425516049245368.js
205 ms
zrt_lookup.html
155 ms
show_ads_impl.js
155 ms
1f609.png
118 ms
wordpress.png
680 ms
ads
212 ms
osd.js
10 ms
codefromjames.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
codefromjames.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
codefromjames.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codefromjames.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codefromjames.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codefromjames.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codefrom James. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: