Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

codeitc.com

Code Inspection & Testing Co - Home

Page Load Speed

86 ms in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

43 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

codeitc.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to codeitc.com homepage info - get ready to check Code Itc best content right away, or after learning these important things about codeitc.com

                                  

Visit codeitc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codeitc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 43 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codeitc.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codeitc.com

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Codeitc.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (43 ms) belongs to the original domain Codeitc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

482.0 kB

After Optimization

448.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Codeitc.com main page is 482.0 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 233.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 669 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 655 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 669 B or 51% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 233.5 kB
  • After minification 233.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Code Itc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 101.4 kB
  • After minification 101.4 kB
  • After compression 94.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 145.9 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB
  • After compression 120.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codeitc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

codeitc.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

codeitc.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

codeitc.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codeitc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Codeitc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Code Itc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: