7.4 sec in total
2.4 sec
4.6 sec
369 ms
Visit codepak.org now to see the best up-to-date Code Pak content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codepak.org
Code Pakistan is a prominent NGO in Pakistan that has a mission to build a prosperous Pakistan through effective development and education initiatives.
Visit codepak.orgWe analyzed Codepak.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
codepak.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.594
11/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
2427 ms
112 ms
103 ms
25 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Codepak.org, 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 8% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Codepak.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (28%)
3.7 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Codepak.org main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 443.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Code Pak needs image optimization as it can save up to 443.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 389.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codepak.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (50%)
82
41
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Code Pak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
codepak.org
2427 ms
style.css
112 ms
rhinoslider-1.05.css
103 ms
jquery.min.js
25 ms
rhinoslider-1.05.min.js
123 ms
mousewheel.js
103 ms
easing.js
751 ms
nextgen_gallery_related_images.css
125 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
149 ms
gmw.css
146 ms
jquery.js
277 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
192 ms
ajax.js
192 ms
persist.js
194 ms
store.js
196 ms
ngg_store.js
245 ms
lightbox_context.js
249 ms
trigger_buttons.css
254 ms
shutter.css
251 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.css
317 ms
style.css
318 ms
nggallery.css
297 ms
widget.js
324 ms
widget.css
346 ms
comment-reply.min.js
363 ms
navigation.js
383 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
377 ms
common.js
375 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.js
401 ms
shutter.js
447 ms
nextgen_shutter.js
451 ms
ajax_pagination.js
431 ms
157684211
123 ms
logo.jpg
114 ms
salogan.jpg
121 ms
salogan-urdu.png
154 ms
search-icon.jpg
111 ms
IMG_9308-e1456748796813.jpg
339 ms
IMG_9157-e1456811078907.jpg
337 ms
IMG_9159-e1456811566791.jpg
338 ms
IMG_9231-e1456822209552.jpg
378 ms
Banner-Pic-e1456752734372.jpg
337 ms
ceo.jpg
210 ms
bullet.png
293 ms
P8123007.jpg
526 ms
P8132543.jpg
515 ms
P8122985.jpg
525 ms
6-e1450883534369.jpg
445 ms
2-e1450335246549.png
715 ms
IMG-20151210-WA0011-e1449759678342.jpg
511 ms
S1060287-e1449157415880.jpg
665 ms
thumbs_P8112841.JPG
578 ms
thumbs_P8112593.JPG
579 ms
thumbs_P8112611.JPG
581 ms
f-icons.jpg
532 ms
social-icon.png
623 ms
f-bullet.png
623 ms
w-logo.png
624 ms
Felixti.TTF
622 ms
rhinoslider-sprite.png
1340 ms
player.js
119 ms
player.css
103 ms
ga.js
71 ms
vuid.min.js
103 ms
likebox.php
444 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
proxy.html
45 ms
559375804.jpg
105 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
46 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
54 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
59 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
77 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
55 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
55 ms
12717909_977893472291539_2714656019992663659_n.jpg
151 ms
10513273_679800582100831_4085325153337141332_n.jpg
27 ms
12715231_240875946245199_5214282138118217582_n.jpg
41 ms
12717490_226936837646443_611570003931678170_n.jpg
28 ms
11937446_1004942132929492_4966223739851546887_n.jpg
139 ms
10274025_896468073806813_1134075096220217858_n.jpg
26 ms
11924917_1667299223511857_8613866317287501511_n.jpg
59 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
22 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
22 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
8 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
4 ms
codepak.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
codepak.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
codepak.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codepak.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codepak.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codepak.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Code Pak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: