Tools & Wizards About Us
codepub.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

codepub.com

域名到期-域名续费提醒

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

458 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

codepub.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Codepub content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codepub.com

域名是企业重要的资产,您所访问的域名已经过期,请尽快联络注册商续费

Visit codepub.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codepub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 458 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codepub.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codepub.com

458 ms

common.css

119 ms

css.css

124 ms

jquery.js

190 ms

common.js

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Codepub.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.dnsjquery.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) relates to the external source Hm.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 261.4 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Codepub.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 144.7 kB

  • Original 171.6 kB
  • After minification 156.6 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 107.4 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codepub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 39.4 kB
  • After minification 39.4 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 20.3 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codepub.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (3%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

92

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codepub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

codepub.com

codepub.com

458 ms

common.css

common.css

119 ms

css.css

css.css

124 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

190 ms

common.js

common.js

85 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

347 ms

e2b6f825c1320bc0ea0b58a12e95db2f.png

e2b6f825c1320bc0ea0b58a12e95db2f.png

493 ms

0f0ae184d921d23b2bf2b7a59a1e4e67.png

0f0ae184d921d23b2bf2b7a59a1e4e67.png

370 ms

a9754cbcc97c8d65af6d4ca3e5af4340.png

a9754cbcc97c8d65af6d4ca3e5af4340.png

429 ms

ddd81be7cc7efbf54d25a5992d6b8599.png

ddd81be7cc7efbf54d25a5992d6b8599.png

428 ms

943.jpg

943.jpg

488 ms

469.jpg

469.jpg

436 ms

425.jpg

425.jpg

504 ms

322.jpg

322.jpg

504 ms

35.jpg

35.jpg

549 ms

813.jpg

813.jpg

610 ms

238.jpg

238.jpg

626 ms

583.jpg

583.jpg

548 ms

895.jpg

895.jpg

610 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

305 ms

icons.png

icons.png

306 ms

title_1.gif

title_1.gif

303 ms

list_icon.gif

list_icon.gif

305 ms

side_title.png

side_title.png

367 ms

list_1.png

list_1.png

368 ms

list_2.png

list_2.png

365 ms

list_3.png

list_3.png

368 ms

list_4.png

list_4.png

432 ms

list_5.png

list_5.png

432 ms

list_6.png

list_6.png

426 ms

list_7.png

list_7.png

427 ms

list_8.png

list_8.png

426 ms

list_9.png

list_9.png

427 ms

list_10.png

list_10.png

500 ms

list_11.png

list_11.png

501 ms

list_12.png

list_12.png

501 ms

list_13.png

list_13.png

501 ms

list_14.png

list_14.png

503 ms

list_16.png

list_16.png

502 ms

list_17.png

list_17.png

545 ms

list_18.png

list_18.png

546 ms

list_19.png

list_19.png

549 ms

list_20.png

list_20.png

549 ms

list_21.png

list_21.png

557 ms

list_22.png

list_22.png

558 ms

list_23.png

list_23.png

607 ms

list_24.png

list_24.png

605 ms

list_25.png

list_25.png

609 ms

list_26.png

list_26.png

610 ms

list_27.png

list_27.png

620 ms

list_28.png

list_28.png

621 ms

list_29.png

list_29.png

665 ms

list_31.png

list_31.png

667 ms

list_34.png

list_34.png

668 ms

list_35.png

list_35.png

437 ms

hm.js

hm.js

959 ms

list_36.png

list_36.png

389 ms

list_38.png

list_38.png

389 ms

list_39.png

list_39.png

430 ms

list_40.png

list_40.png

430 ms

list_41.png

list_41.png

370 ms

list_42.png

list_42.png

371 ms

list_43.png

list_43.png

386 ms

list_44.png

list_44.png

386 ms

list_46.png

list_46.png

368 ms

list_47.png

list_47.png

368 ms

list_48.png

list_48.png

368 ms

list_49.png

list_49.png

371 ms

list_50.png

list_50.png

387 ms

list_51.png

list_51.png

387 ms

list_52.png

list_52.png

354 ms

list_53.png

list_53.png

354 ms

list_54.png

list_54.png

354 ms

list_55.png

list_55.png

358 ms

list_57.png

list_57.png

378 ms

list_58.png

list_58.png

378 ms

list_59.png

list_59.png

367 ms

list_60.png

list_60.png

367 ms

list_61.png

list_61.png

366 ms

list_62.png

list_62.png

372 ms

list_63.png

list_63.png

385 ms

list_64.png

list_64.png

387 ms

list_65.png

list_65.png

367 ms

list_66.png

list_66.png

369 ms

list_68.png

list_68.png

366 ms

list_69.png

list_69.png

372 ms

list_70.png

list_70.png

386 ms

list_71.png

list_71.png

387 ms

list_72.png

list_72.png

367 ms

list_74.png

list_74.png

368 ms

list_75.png

list_75.png

367 ms

list_76.png

list_76.png

372 ms

list_77.png

list_77.png

385 ms

title_3.gif

title_3.gif

387 ms

corp_1.gif

corp_1.gif

367 ms

b_logo.png

b_logo.png

367 ms

Accessibility Review

codepub.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

codepub.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

codepub.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codepub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Codepub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

codepub.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codepub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: