Tools & Wizards About Us
cofit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

cofit.com

Cofit: Automatic and Continuous Screenchangers for Extrusion

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

554 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

454 ms

cofit.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cofit.com homepage info - get ready to check Cofit best content right away, or after learning these important things about cofit.com

Research, engineering, manufacturing and distribution of automatic/continuous screen changers for clean, post-consumer, post-industrial plastic materials

Visit cofit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cofit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 554 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cofit.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.411

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cofit.com

554 ms

all.css

168 ms

font-awesome.min.css

1250 ms

js

83 ms

style.min.css

333 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Cofit.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cofit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.4 kB (15%)

Content Size

740.6 kB

After Optimization

627.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cofit.com main page is 740.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 447.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 104.7 kB

  • Original 128.0 kB
  • After minification 122.4 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cofit needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 447.1 kB
  • After minification 447.1 kB
  • After compression 443.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 150.8 kB
  • After minification 150.8 kB
  • After compression 149.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cofit.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (84%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cofit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cofit.com

cofit.com

554 ms

all.css

all.css

168 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1250 ms

js

js

83 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

333 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

342 ms

styles.css

styles.css

347 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

523 ms

xstore.min.css

xstore.min.css

423 ms

wpb.min.css

wpb.min.css

454 ms

back-top.min.css

back-top.min.css

471 ms

mobile-panel.min.css

mobile-panel.min.css

460 ms

contact-forms.min.css

contact-forms.min.css

547 ms

contacts.min.css

contacts.min.css

562 ms

menu.min.css

menu.min.css

585 ms

kirki-styles.css

kirki-styles.css

584 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

627 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

657 ms

search.min.css

search.min.css

661 ms

ajax-search.min.css

ajax-search.min.css

678 ms

off-canvas.min.css

off-canvas.min.css

682 ms

mobile-menu.min.css

mobile-menu.min.css

736 ms

toggles-by-arrow.min.css

toggles-by-arrow.min.css

756 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

788 ms

public.css

public.css

794 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

804 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

853 ms

blog-global.min.css

blog-global.min.css

890 ms

index.js

index.js

883 ms

index.js

index.js

895 ms

api.js

api.js

38 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

907 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

954 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1000 ms

index.js

index.js

990 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1001 ms

imagesLoaded.js

imagesLoaded.js

1011 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

jquery.lazyload.js

1274 ms

etheme-scripts.min.js

etheme-scripts.min.js

1274 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1278 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

952 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

944 ms

fixedHeader.min.js

fixedHeader.min.js

940 ms

ajaxSearch.min.js

ajaxSearch.min.js

863 ms

mobileMenu.min.js

mobileMenu.min.js

833 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

827 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

817 ms

mobilePanel.min.js

mobilePanel.min.js

799 ms

back-top.min.js

back-top.min.js

796 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

312 ms

embed

embed

207 ms

logo-cofit-scontornato-bianco.png

logo-cofit-scontornato-bianco.png

219 ms

lazy.png

lazy.png

165 ms

xstore-placeholder-1x1.png

xstore-placeholder-1x1.png

166 ms

xstore-placeholder-178x100.png

xstore-placeholder-178x100.png

217 ms

drag.png

drag.png

220 ms

xstore-placeholder-300x300.png

xstore-placeholder-300x300.png

219 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

121 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

176 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCHPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCHPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

209 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCMPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCMPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

208 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCFPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCFPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff

207 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

210 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

209 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

206 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

209 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

210 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

441 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

173 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

312 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

310 ms

xstore-icons-light.ttf

xstore-icons-light.ttf

336 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

400 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

310 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

200 ms

js

js

281 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

146 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

14 ms

search.js

search.js

26 ms

main.js

main.js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

cofit.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cofit.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cofit.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cofit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cofit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cofit.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cofit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: