Tools & Wizards About Us
cogburncares.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

cogburncares.com

Cogburn Cares

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

341 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

489 ms

cogburncares.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cogburn Cares content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cogburncares.com

Visit cogburncares.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cogburncares.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cogburncares.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cogburncares.com

341 ms

style.css

15 ms

animate.min.css

28 ms

frontend.min.css

46 ms

style.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Cogburncares.com, 22% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (512 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

951.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cogburncares.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 414.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 59.5 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 414.8 kB
  • After minification 414.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cogburn Cares images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 363.4 kB
  • After minification 363.3 kB
  • After compression 362.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 686 B

  • Original 163.9 kB
  • After minification 163.8 kB
  • After compression 163.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cogburncares.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (90%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cogburn Cares. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cogburncares.com

cogburncares.com

341 ms

style.css

style.css

15 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

28 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

46 ms

style.css

style.css

38 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

32 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

44 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

26 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

38 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

41 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

63 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

56 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

91 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

57 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

58 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

91 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

92 ms

widget-google_maps.min.css

widget-google_maps.min.css

92 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

93 ms

post-11.css

post-11.css

94 ms

post-20.css

post-20.css

93 ms

post-16.css

post-16.css

97 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

98 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

94 ms

css

css

33 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

97 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

95 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

94 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

123 ms

script.js

script.js

139 ms

wc-quick-view.js

wc-quick-view.js

136 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

137 ms

frontend-light.min.js

frontend-light.min.js

138 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

188 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

189 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

190 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

190 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

191 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

184 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

171 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

170 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

169 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

166 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

166 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

160 ms

Cogburncares-Homepage-e1725105073968.jpg

Cogburncares-Homepage-e1725105073968.jpg

115 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

59 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

69 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

84 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

84 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

84 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

95 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

95 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

95 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

102 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

102 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

102 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

101 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

101 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

102 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

115 ms

embed

embed

368 ms

embed

embed

512 ms

js

js

37 ms

search.js

search.js

3 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

14 ms

Accessibility Review

cogburncares.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

cogburncares.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cogburncares.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cogburncares.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cogburncares.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cogburncares.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cogburn Cares. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: