2.9 sec in total
563 ms
2.2 sec
113 ms
Visit cohands.in now to see the best up-to-date Cohands content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cohands.in
Visit cohands.inWe analyzed Cohands.in page load time and found that the first response time was 563 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cohands.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
563 ms
69 ms
46 ms
306 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Cohands.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Cohands.in.
Page size can be reduced by 192.2 kB (57%)
334.8 kB
142.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Cohands.in main page is 334.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 190.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.3 kB, which is 54% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cohands needs image optimization as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 64.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cohands.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
19
19
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cohands. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
cohands.in
563 ms
websol.css
69 ms
style.css
46 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
306 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
79 ms
top.png
76 ms
topback.jpg
54 ms
logo.png
51 ms
q1.png
82 ms
q2.png
72 ms
q3.png
125 ms
q4.png
126 ms
c5.png
107 ms
c6.png
113 ms
c7.png
116 ms
arrowdown2.png
112 ms
bullet1.gif
131 ms
homebnr.gif
1410 ms
hordots.gif
136 ms
activities.gif
254 ms
arrow_nav.gif
152 ms
cohands.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cohands.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cohands.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cohands.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cohands.in main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
cohands.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cohands. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: