929 ms in total
91 ms
673 ms
165 ms
Welcome to coking.com homepage info - get ready to check Coking best content right away, or after learning these important things about coking.com
Visit coking.comWe analyzed Coking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 838 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
coking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value3.7 s
86/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
91 ms
121 ms
57 ms
24 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Coking.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (132 ms) belongs to the original domain Coking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 103.3 kB (11%)
980.0 kB
876.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Coking.com main page is 980.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 814.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)
45
16
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coking.com
91 ms
coking.com
121 ms
gtm.js
57 ms
style.css
24 ms
respond.min.js
45 ms
css
19 ms
css
31 ms
farbtastic.min.css
68 ms
css
35 ms
font-awesome.min.css
67 ms
upme.css
69 ms
default.css
71 ms
upme-responsive.css
77 ms
style.min.css
78 ms
ajax-load-more.css
81 ms
styles.css
83 ms
post-tiles.css
84 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
87 ms
default-styles.css
88 ms
jquery.min.js
109 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
100 ms
upme-fitvids.js
103 ms
tinymce_language_strings.js
105 ms
jquery-functions.js
108 ms
presentations.js
108 ms
fixed_n_sticky-1.6.js
122 ms
js
68 ms
jquery.form.min.js
129 ms
scripts.js
125 ms
jquery.adrotate.clicktracker.js
129 ms
ajax-load-more.min.js
130 ms
upme-custom.js
132 ms
js
67 ms
logo-coking.png
63 ms
magnifier.png
55 ms
nav-grad-coking.jpg
56 ms
logo-coking-responsive.png
56 ms
refcomm-header.jpg
122 ms
Coking-featured.jpg
121 ms
gray-overlay.png
56 ms
ExxonMobil-Antwerp-delayed-coker-300x250.png
122 ms
Coker-egress-fire-300x250.png
124 ms
lightning-strikes-LO-RES-300x250.jpg
58 ms
safety-protocols-in-the-refinery-need-to-improve-300x250.png
123 ms
Screen-Shot-2019-01-02-at-11.33.45-AM-300x250.png
130 ms
coker-structural-overlay-300x250.png
130 ms
ajax-loader.gif
77 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
35 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
36 ms
coking.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
coking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
coking.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coking.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: