Tools & Wizards About Us
colive.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    31% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

colive.in

Colive - India's Largest Rental Exchange Platform

Page Load Speed

18 sec in total

First Response

564 ms

Resources Loaded

16.9 sec

Page Rendered

536 ms

colive.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Colive content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about colive.in

Looking for PGs, Luxury PGs, Couple PGs, Co-living Spaces, Family Homes or anything else on rentals? Find it on Colive. Rent Kar, Colive Par.

Visit colive.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Colive.in page load time and found that the first response time was 564 ms and then it took 17.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

colive.in performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value13,640 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

colive.in

564 ms

www.colive.in

2246 ms

font-awesome.css

17 ms

Tracker.js

1048 ms

style.css

1913 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Colive.in, 10% (7 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Colive.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (22%)

Content Size

7.1 MB

After Optimization

5.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Colive.in main page is 7.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 150.5 kB

  • Original 168.9 kB
  • After minification 109.8 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 59.1 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 338.2 kB

  • Original 5.6 MB
  • After minification 5.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Colive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 838.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 853.5 kB
  • After compression 261.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 838.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 250.5 kB

  • Original 299.1 kB
  • After minification 254.0 kB
  • After compression 48.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Colive.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 250.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (45%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Colive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

colive.in

colive.in

564 ms

www.colive.in

www.colive.in

2246 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

17 ms

Tracker.js

Tracker.js

1048 ms

style.css

style.css

1913 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

1384 ms

exercise2.css

exercise2.css

1109 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

1957 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

873 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

2323 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1165 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1934 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

1457 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

1658 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

1748 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

2213 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

2039 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2183 ms

js

js

58 ms

getSeal

getSeal

468 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

4 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1635 ms

WebTracker.aspx

WebTracker.aspx

252 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

14 ms

logo.png

logo.png

288 ms

fb.svg

fb.svg

379 ms

gplus.svg

gplus.svg

474 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

78 ms

identity.js

identity.js

3 ms

104116843490435

104116843490435

52 ms

15 ms

progress.gif

progress.gif

280 ms

Ubuntu-regular.ttf

Ubuntu-regular.ttf

557 ms

Ubuntu-light.ttf

Ubuntu-light.ttf

844 ms

1.png

1.png

943 ms

TopArrow.png

TopArrow.png

302 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

41 ms

siteseal_gd_3_h_l_m.gif

siteseal_gd_3_h_l_m.gif

75 ms

GetDashBoardDetails

GetDashBoardDetails

761 ms

Property-Icons_3_20170830124948_20170902070357.png

Property-Icons_3_20170830124948_20170902070357.png

298 ms

Property-Icons2_20170905110817.png

Property-Icons2_20170905110817.png

281 ms

Property%20Icons-01-01_20170828013626_20170902070406.png

Property%20Icons-01-01_20170828013626_20170902070406.png

298 ms

Property-Icons_6_20170830125024_20170902070439.png

Property-Icons_6_20170830125024_20170902070439.png

281 ms

Property-Icons_20170905110840.png

Property-Icons_20170905110840.png

282 ms

Property%20Icons-05_20170905102603.png

Property%20Icons-05_20170905102603.png

281 ms

Property-Icons_4_20170830125040_20170902070418.png

Property-Icons_4_20170830125040_20170902070418.png

554 ms

find-like-minds.png

find-like-minds.png

558 ms

1-50.jpg

1-50.jpg

11475 ms

Bed.png

Bed.png

1232 ms

WIFI_20170601100940.png

WIFI_20170601100940.png

585 ms

Refrigerator_20160729053002.png

Refrigerator_20160729053002.png

587 ms

WashingMachine_20160729053041.png

WashingMachine_20160729053041.png

823 ms

_20160827.jpeg

_20160827.jpeg

5619 ms

DishTV_20170601100848.png

DishTV_20170601100848.png

873 ms

Electricity_20160729055333.png

Electricity_20160729055333.png

878 ms

GasBill_20160729055347.png

GasBill_20160729055347.png

1096 ms

1_20170125.JPG

1_20170125.JPG

5308 ms

TVUnit_20160727011342.png

TVUnit_20160727011342.png

1182 ms

SSN_20170125.jpg

SSN_20170125.jpg

1370 ms

common.js

common.js

5 ms

util.js

util.js

23 ms

stats.js

stats.js

21 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

52 ms

controls.js

controls.js

4 ms

places_impl.js

places_impl.js

3 ms

Accessibility Review

colive.in accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

colive.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

colive.in SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Colive.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Colive.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

colive.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Colive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: