1.7 sec in total
76 ms
1.1 sec
496 ms
Welcome to collideascope.co homepage info - get ready to check Collideascope best content right away, or after learning these important things about collideascope.co
Our goal is simple: make sure our clients are visible online and help them find ways to grow their business through effective digital marketing.
Visit collideascope.coWe analyzed Collideascope.co page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
collideascope.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
76 ms
124 ms
95 ms
48 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Collideascope.co, 2% (1 request) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Js.hs-analytics.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (630 ms) belongs to the original domain Collideascope.co.
Page size can be reduced by 179.7 kB (21%)
849.2 kB
669.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Collideascope.co main page is 849.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 468.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Collideascope images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Collideascope.co has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (67%)
52
17
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Collideascope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
collideascope.co
76 ms
collideascope.co
124 ms
theplus-post-260.min.css
95 ms
bootstrap.min.css
48 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
105 ms
post-5.css
110 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
109 ms
post-260.css
98 ms
post-265.css
116 ms
post-16.css
185 ms
post-168.css
193 ms
jquery.min.js
203 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
198 ms
post-320.css
196 ms
animations.min.css
287 ms
core.min.js
314 ms
mouse.min.js
319 ms
slider.min.js
319 ms
theplus-post-260.min.js
320 ms
draggable.min.js
320 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
319 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
331 ms
lazyload.min.js
403 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
411 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
521 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
412 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
415 ms
dom-ready.min.js
539 ms
hooks.min.js
496 ms
i18n.min.js
501 ms
a11y.min.js
502 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
468 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
561 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
560 ms
frontend.min.js
592 ms
waypoints.min.js
561 ms
frontend.min.js
612 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
630 ms
5319384.js
120 ms
collideascope-logo-white.svg
403 ms
laptop-upscape-homepage-768x488.png
597 ms
sawing-shearing.jpg
246 ms
assisted-living.jpg
279 ms
triplepoint.jpg
297 ms
kroeschell.jpg
318 ms
bioteam.jpg
336 ms
background-divider.svg
339 ms
elementor-1024x756.jpg
387 ms
aie-elementor-jpg.webp
398 ms
assistedl-living.jpg
426 ms
top_clutch.co_ppc_company_michigan_2023-278x300.png
439 ms
mi_detroit_web-developers_2023_transparent.svg
429 ms
google-ads.png
449 ms
google-analytics.png
537 ms
collideascope.co accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
collideascope.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
collideascope.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Collideascope.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Collideascope.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
collideascope.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Collideascope. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: