Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

colocall.net

ColoCall | Датацентр Колокол. ЦОД Київ Україна. VDS, Dedicated, Cloud

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

513 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

355 ms

colocall.net screenshot

About Website

Visit colocall.net now to see the best up-to-date Colo Call content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about colocall.net

Датацентр Колокол, розміщення обладнання, хмарні рішення. / Data center Colocall, Kyiv, Ukraine. Colocation and public cloud services.

Visit colocall.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Colocall.net page load time and found that the first response time was 513 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

colocall.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

colocall.net

513 ms

www.colocall.net

353 ms

screen.css

160 ms

counter2.0.js

967 ms

advanced.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Colocall.net, 18% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Get.mycounter.ua. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Colocall.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.5 kB (25%)

Content Size

97.9 kB

After Optimization

73.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Colocall.net main page is 97.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 51.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 11.9 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 48.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Colo Call images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 12.0 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Colocall.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (20%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Colo Call. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

colocall.net accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

colocall.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

colocall.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    UK

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Colocall.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Ukrainian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Colocall.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Colo Call. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: