1.6 sec in total
300 ms
1.1 sec
216 ms
Visit colorfitting.com now to see the best up-to-date Colorfitting content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about colorfitting.com
The home of Color Fitting the new way to create color schemes effortlessly.
Visit colorfitting.comWe analyzed Colorfitting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
colorfitting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value1.4 s
100/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
300 ms
90 ms
17 ms
17 ms
126 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Colorfitting.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Colorfitting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 42.4 kB (19%)
221.0 kB
178.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Colorfitting.com main page is 221.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 181.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.9 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Colorfitting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 971 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Colorfitting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (27%)
26
19
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Colorfitting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
colorfitting.com
300 ms
default.css
90 ms
urchin.js
17 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
bg01.jpg
126 ms
bg03.jpg
178 ms
homepage01.png
369 ms
bg05.jpg
366 ms
bg04.jpg
293 ms
spacer.gif
198 ms
homepage03.gif
214 ms
homepage02.gif
260 ms
homepage04.gif
294 ms
MyColors_02_149.png
396 ms
MyColors_09_149.png
466 ms
MyColors_11_149.png
391 ms
MyColors_05_149.png
488 ms
MyColors_07_149.png
555 ms
MyColors_03_149.png
474 ms
printscreen05.png
489 ms
homepage05.gif
484 ms
colorfitting32.png
549 ms
MyColors_12_149.png
581 ms
MyColors_19_149.png
596 ms
MyColors_20_149.png
585 ms
MyColors_21_149.png
700 ms
MyColors_22_149.png
633 ms
colorfitting.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
colorfitting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
colorfitting.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Colorfitting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Colorfitting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
colorfitting.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Colorfitting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: