5.7 sec in total
1.3 sec
4.2 sec
192 ms
Visit comag.it now to see the best up-to-date Comag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comag.it
Packaging and automation systems Innovative packaging solutions labeling stretch,shrink,multipack, cluster, tamper evident
Visit comag.itWe analyzed Comag.it page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
comag.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.2 s
0/100
10%
Value34.1 s
0/100
25%
Value23.9 s
0/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value32.3 s
0/100
10%
1324 ms
212 ms
368 ms
208 ms
340 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Comag.it, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Comag.it.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (50%)
4.8 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Comag.it main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 613.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 613.5 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comag.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (69%)
72
22
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1324 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
212 ms
style.min.css
368 ms
theme.min.css
208 ms
style.css
340 ms
styles.css
208 ms
settings.css
458 ms
Defaults.css
430 ms
front.min.css
315 ms
js_composer.min.css
751 ms
css
22 ms
main.min.css
922 ms
fontello.min.css
492 ms
post-type.min.css
551 ms
custom.css
937 ms
wc-dt-custom.css
862 ms
media.css
766 ms
mega-menu.css
678 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
814 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
855 ms
style.css
873 ms
style.min.css
936 ms
slick.min.css
959 ms
icons.css
966 ms
animate.min.css
1085 ms
pricing.min.css
1029 ms
jquery.js
1192 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1039 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1080 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1106 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1134 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1144 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
1184 ms
front.min.js
1118 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
1155 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
1167 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
1170 ms
js
61 ms
custom.min.js
1088 ms
slick.min.js
1113 ms
slick-custom.min.js
1088 ms
api.js
38 ms
stripes.css
1205 ms
main.min.js
1158 ms
scripts.js
1039 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1033 ms
woocommerce.min.js
973 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
967 ms
legacy.min.js
993 ms
post-type.min.js
955 ms
wp-embed.min.js
831 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
792 ms
tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvLFG6o3mp.ttf
19 ms
tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhv8la6o3mp.ttf
19 ms
tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvy1a6o3mp.ttf
19 ms
comag-1.png
506 ms
comag_m.png
506 ms
FORMAT_HEADER.png
512 ms
strech01-300x300.png
507 ms
TAMPER01-1-300x300.png
507 ms
MULTIP01-300x300.png
508 ms
handle_01-1.png
507 ms
food.png
506 ms
beverage.png
508 ms
personal_care.png
509 ms
home_care.png
509 ms
healthcare.png
509 ms
diary.png
526 ms
cup.png
541 ms
chemical.png
548 ms
beer.png
555 ms
tissue_comag.png
556 ms
credit_bianco.png
586 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
10 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
10 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
10 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
572 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
225 ms
ajax-loader.gif
174 ms
ult-silk.woff
170 ms
comag.it accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
comag.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
comag.it SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comag.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comag.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comag.it
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Comag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: