2.9 sec in total
848 ms
1.9 sec
172 ms
Visit comfortresearch.com now to see the best up-to-date Comfort Research content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comfortresearch.com
Visit comfortresearch.comWe analyzed Comfortresearch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 848 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
comfortresearch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value480 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
848 ms
33 ms
116 ms
111 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Comfortresearch.com, 18% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (848 ms) belongs to the original domain Comfortresearch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 79.2 kB (12%)
655.4 kB
576.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Comfortresearch.com main page is 655.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 341.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comfort Research images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comfortresearch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (82%)
62
11
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comfort Research. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comfortresearch.com
848 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
33 ms
jquery.easy-autocomplete.min.js
116 ms
colors.js
111 ms
easy-autocomplete.min.css
113 ms
easy-autocomplete.themes.min.css
113 ms
js
93 ms
admin_icon.min.css
136 ms
frontend_main.css
172 ms
bootstrap.css
218 ms
font-awesome.css
172 ms
owl.carousel.css
174 ms
loading_effects.css
175 ms
font-awesome.min.css
174 ms
frontend.css
216 ms
css
50 ms
settings.css
228 ms
css
69 ms
css
72 ms
third-parties.css
231 ms
style.css
272 ms
wplp_front.css
236 ms
css
68 ms
jquery.js
373 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
267 ms
linkify.js
271 ms
frontend_main.js
276 ms
platform.js
60 ms
owl.carousel.js
277 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
373 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
378 ms
js
86 ms
thickbox.js
280 ms
frontend.js
280 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
281 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
335 ms
underscore.min.js
335 ms
wp-util.min.js
336 ms
backbone.min.js
380 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
435 ms
mejs-gw-playlist.min.js
386 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
389 ms
plugins.min.js
390 ms
scripts.min.js
389 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
434 ms
wp-embed.min.js
387 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
367 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
38 ms
stylesheet.css
265 ms
stylesheet.css
268 ms
ga-audiences
29 ms
iframe_api
259 ms
CR-NewLogo.png
240 ms
dummy.png
239 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
233 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
41 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
236 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
215 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
42 ms
raleway-light-webfont.woff
334 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
43 ms
raleway-extralight-webfont.svg
213 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
43 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf
43 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
234 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
42 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
235 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
42 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
235 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
43 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
233 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
72 ms
fontello.woff
315 ms
loader.gif
73 ms
CR-Homepage-Banner-01.jpg
279 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
71 ms
www-widgetapi.js
26 ms
sdk.js
47 ms
raleway-extralight-webfont.woff
177 ms
sdk.js
5 ms
comfortresearch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
comfortresearch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
comfortresearch.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comfortresearch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Comfortresearch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comfortresearch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comfort Research. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: