5.6 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.6 sec
517 ms
Click here to check amazing Companies Port content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about companiesport.com
Visit companiesport.comWe analyzed Companiesport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
companiesport.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
3/100
10%
Value19.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
1523 ms
92 ms
129 ms
145 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Companiesport.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Companiesport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 387.2 kB (15%)
2.7 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Companiesport.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Companies Port images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 91.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Companiesport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.9 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (89%)
72
8
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Companies Port. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
companiesport.com
1523 ms
style.min.css
92 ms
extendify-utilities.css
129 ms
styles.css
145 ms
frontend.css
153 ms
bootstrap.min.css
225 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
187 ms
all.min.css
183 ms
icons.min.css
180 ms
slick-min.css
198 ms
slick-theme-min.css
221 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
238 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.css
240 ms
main.min.css
336 ms
styling-options.min.css
248 ms
style.css
267 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
310 ms
custom-frontend-legacy.min.css
301 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
355 ms
swiper.min.css
304 ms
post-11559.css
325 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
430 ms
v4-shims.min.css
375 ms
global.css
360 ms
post-990.css
368 ms
post-24116.css
380 ms
css
29 ms
jquery.min.js
478 ms
rbtools.min.js
455 ms
rs6.min.js
518 ms
v4-shims.min.js
427 ms
animations.min.css
436 ms
rs6.css
490 ms
index.js
489 ms
index.js
491 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
488 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
587 ms
modernizr.custom.js
583 ms
slideout.min.js
514 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js
478 ms
slick.min.js
465 ms
core.min.js
457 ms
menu.min.js
453 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
448 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
447 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
629 ms
dom-ready.min.js
413 ms
hooks.min.js
597 ms
i18n.min.js
588 ms
a11y.min.js
587 ms
autocomplete.min.js
580 ms
mouse.min.js
560 ms
slider.min.js
525 ms
parallax-background.min.js
522 ms
custom.min.js
517 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
503 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
483 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
469 ms
frontend.min.js
466 ms
waypoints.min.js
459 ms
swiper.min.js
455 ms
share-link.min.js
448 ms
dialog.min.js
401 ms
frontend.min.js
377 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
426 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
422 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
374 ms
COMPANIESPORT_LOGO-trans-01-01-1-e1691527185111.png
355 ms
mobilelogo-01-01-01-01-01-01.png
366 ms
lazyloader-1.gif
352 ms
CP-platform-01-01.png
560 ms
new-york-footer-01-01-01-scaled-1.jpeg
683 ms
useful_links-02-e1691338263171-300x83.jpg
291 ms
houzez-iconfont.ttf
317 ms
companiesport.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
companiesport.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
companiesport.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Companiesport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Companiesport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
companiesport.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Companies Port. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: