Tools & Wizards About Us
compareseo.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

compareseo.net

Top Digital Marketing Agency in Delhi, India | Trusted Services

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

492 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

364 ms

compareseo.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compareseo content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compareseo.net

Compare SEO the best digital marketing agency in Delhi, India, providing top-notch services nationwide and worldwide. Elevate your online presence today!

Visit compareseo.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Compareseo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

compareseo.net performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.compareseo.net

492 ms

style.min.css

127 ms

styles.css

330 ms

zilla-likes.css

163 ms

style.css

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Compareseo.net, 32% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (492 ms) belongs to the original domain Compareseo.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.8 kB (32%)

Content Size

428.1 kB

After Optimization

290.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Compareseo.net main page is 428.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 288.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 114.1 kB

  • Original 139.3 kB
  • After minification 124.0 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 288.8 kB
  • After minification 265.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compareseo images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (55%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compareseo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.compareseo.net

www.compareseo.net

492 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

127 ms

styles.css

styles.css

330 ms

zilla-likes.css

zilla-likes.css

163 ms

style.css

style.css

184 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

191 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

197 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

239 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

312 ms

style.css

style.css

315 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

257 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

382 ms

custom-style.css

custom-style.css

307 ms

css

css

32 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

319 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

19 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

27 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

45 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

53 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

53 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

54 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

91 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

55 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

54 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

53 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

54 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

76 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

77 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

262 ms

logo-compare-seo.jpg

logo-compare-seo.jpg

74 ms

mocup-2.png

mocup-2.png

130 ms

pricing-blue-1.png

pricing-blue-1.png

72 ms

pricing-pink-1.png

pricing-pink-1.png

128 ms

pricing-blue-2-1.png

pricing-blue-2-1.png

134 ms

pricing-pink-2-1.png

pricing-pink-2-1.png

191 ms

pricing-blue-3-1.png

pricing-blue-3-1.png

142 ms

pricing-pink-3-1.png

pricing-pink-3-1.png

190 ms

Accessibility Review

compareseo.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

compareseo.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

compareseo.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compareseo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compareseo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

compareseo.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compareseo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: