7 sec in total
510 ms
6.1 sec
425 ms
Visit comparetrap.com now to see the best up-to-date Comparetrap content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparetrap.com
Best online price, specifications, features comparison site in India | Comparetrap
Visit comparetrap.comWe analyzed Comparetrap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 510 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
comparetrap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value3,160 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.282
43/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
510 ms
1553 ms
998 ms
1136 ms
937 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Comparetrap.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Comparetrap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 730.9 kB (60%)
1.2 MB
489.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparetrap.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 463.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.7 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 929 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comparetrap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 247.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 247.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 391.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparetrap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 391.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (44%)
85
48
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparetrap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparetrap.com
510 ms
www.comparetrap.com
1553 ms
bootstrap.min.css
998 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1136 ms
select2.min.css
937 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
949 ms
owl.carousel.css
964 ms
jquery-ui.css
1241 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1169 ms
animate.css
1430 ms
reset.css
1201 ms
style.css
1285 ms
responsive.css
1367 ms
option7.css
1406 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
1492 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1233 ms
select2.min.js
1249 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1250 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1248 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
1232 ms
jquery.actual.min.js
1465 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1454 ms
jquery.elevatezoom.js
1475 ms
theme-script.js
1456 ms
analytics.js
293 ms
logo.png
387 ms
search.png
743 ms
14.png
742 ms
19.png
745 ms
3.png
745 ms
7.png
746 ms
2.png
747 ms
22.png
839 ms
4.png
847 ms
5.png
860 ms
6.png
885 ms
9.png
883 ms
slide.jpg
887 ms
slide1.jpg
1050 ms
slide2.jpg
1068 ms
ads1.jpg
1081 ms
s1.png
1112 ms
s2.png
1128 ms
s3.png
1128 ms
s4.png
1278 ms
cate-readmore-arrow.png
1299 ms
compare-trap-mobile-electro.png
1319 ms
compare-trap-mobile-phones.png
1360 ms
compare-trap-mobile-tablet.png
1379 ms
compare-trap-mobile-laptops.png
1368 ms
cate-product5.png
1380 ms
fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff
1394 ms
cate-product6.png
1406 ms
compare-trap-mobile-furnitu.png
1449 ms
cate-product8.png
1452 ms
5731896240_xiaomi-redmi-6-pro.jpg
1466 ms
collect
19 ms
icon-new7.png
1383 ms
6341957082_nokia-x6.jpg
1404 ms
6082479315_Moto-X4-price-in-india-1.jpg
1427 ms
8412957360_motorola-moto-g5-plus.jpg
1481 ms
4769315802_leeco-le-2-le.jpg
1469 ms
6483259710_nokia-105.jpg
1175 ms
2593680417_nokia-230-dual-sim.jpg
1255 ms
3157092648_oppo-f3-plus.jpg
1307 ms
8412957360_samsung-guru-music-2-1p.jpg
1311 ms
6240853917_nokia-216-1p.jpg
1374 ms
3068429751_nokia-130-ds-1p.jpg
1384 ms
4719365802_vivo-v5-plus-p.jpg
1400 ms
0825476931_asus-zenfone-3-laser-p.jpg
1386 ms
4360829157_iball-andi-5l-rider-5l-p.jpg
1435 ms
asus-m515da-bq722ws-1.jpg
1432 ms
hp-14s-dq2606tu-1.jpg
1474 ms
dell-inspiron-3511-D560581WIN9BE-1.jpg
1477 ms
lenovo-81x700cwin-1.jpg
1429 ms
lenovo-82h801l7in-1.jpg
1384 ms
lenovo-82ku017kin-1.jpg
1432 ms
lenovo-81w000upin-1.jpg
1431 ms
lenovo-81wb01bcin-1.jpg
1470 ms
hp-15s-du3563tu-1.jpg
1479 ms
lenovo-82h801l3in-1.jpg
1494 ms
dell-inspiron-3515-D560523WIN9BE-1.jpg
1383 ms
asus-x415ea-ek342ts-1.jpg
1433 ms
sansui-jsk43lsuhd-tv-1.jpg
1430 ms
sony-kdl-49w800g-tv-1.jpg
1463 ms
thomson-32tm3290-tv-1.jpg
1484 ms
lg-43lm5600ptc-tv-1.jpg
1491 ms
bx_loader.gif
1383 ms
comparetrap.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
comparetrap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
comparetrap.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparetrap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Comparetrap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comparetrap.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Comparetrap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: