2.7 sec in total
228 ms
1.2 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to comparisonflight.com homepage info - get ready to check Comparison Flight best content right away, or after learning these important things about comparisonflight.com
Visit comparisonflight.comWe analyzed Comparisonflight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
comparisonflight.com performance score
228 ms
315 ms
104 ms
24 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Comparisonflight.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (524 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparisonflight.com.
Page size can be reduced by 286.5 kB (9%)
3.3 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Comparisonflight.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comparison Flight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 94.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparisonflight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (19%)
26
21
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparison Flight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparisonflight.com
228 ms
www.comparisonflight.com
315 ms
style.css
104 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.js
112 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
72 ms
functions.min.js
73 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
73 ms
slider-settings.min.js
72 ms
counter.js
7 ms
comparisonflight.jpg
430 ms
Travel-Deals-Concern.jpg
212 ms
Low-Cost-Airlines.png
322 ms
Flight-Comparison.jpg
288 ms
Comparative-Advantage-Of-Flight.jpg
145 ms
Enjoy-a-Golden-Triangle-Tour-600x300.jpg
150 ms
Budget-Tips-for-Buying-Flights-to-Mexico-600x300.jpg
287 ms
Tips-for-Cheaper-Grand-Canyon-Helicopter-Tours1-600x300.jpg
288 ms
See-Grand-Canyon-by-Helicopter1-600x300.jpg
347 ms
How-to-Find-Cheap-Flight-to-New-York1-600x300.jpg
386 ms
Tips-to-Find-the-Best-Deals-on-Flights1-600x300.jpg
391 ms
Tips-for-Small-Businesses-to-Save-Travel-Expenses1-600x300.jpg
392 ms
Tips-to-Reduce-Stress-While-Flying-600x300.jpg
457 ms
Tips-to-Book-the-Cheapest-Tickets-form-Bangalore-to-Chennai-India-600x300.jpg
452 ms
Tips-for-Booking-Flight-Online1-600x300.jpg
524 ms
airberlin.gif
496 ms
arrow-right.png
464 ms
t.php
59 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
15 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
4 ms
comparisonflight.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparisonflight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparisonflight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comparisonflight.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparison Flight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: