2.5 sec in total
196 ms
2.1 sec
246 ms
Click here to check amazing Comparisonz content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about comparisonz.com
Easiest way to compare, contrast similarities and differences of any topic side by side. Use reComparison tools to create meaningful comparisons.
Visit comparisonz.comWe analyzed Comparisonz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
comparisonz.com performance score
196 ms
1331 ms
97 ms
185 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Comparisonz.com, 42% (18 requests) were made to Cdn.recomparison.com and 16% (7 requests) were made to Recomparison.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Recomparison.com.
Page size can be reduced by 96.5 kB (47%)
207.1 kB
110.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparisonz.com main page is 207.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 84.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comparisonz images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 39% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparisonz.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (67%)
36
12
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparisonz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparisonz.com
196 ms
recomparison.com
1331 ms
rc-common.css
97 ms
HomeUser.min.css
185 ms
TagExploreSmall.min.css
154 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jsapi
24 ms
brand
40 ms
brand
51 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
rc-common.js
33 ms
chili-1.7.pack.js
137 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
201 ms
jquery.easing.1.1.1.js
138 ms
counter.js
9 ms
19 ms
bg-sprite.png
30 ms
re.png
31 ms
nav-right.png
66 ms
nav-left.png
67 ms
rc-sprite.png
116 ms
4stars.png
68 ms
transparent.gif
67 ms
5stars.png
67 ms
default+en.css
4 ms
default+en.I.js
12 ms
comparisongirl.jpg
72 ms
shade.png
33 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
40 ms
zrt_lookup.html
16 ms
show_ads_impl.js
74 ms
UbuntuTitling-Bold-webfont.woff
34 ms
Comfortaa_Regular-webfont.woff
30 ms
UbuntuTitling-Bold-webfont.ttf
119 ms
Comfortaa_Regular-webfont.ttf
153 ms
ads
109 ms
footerbg.png
70 ms
osd.js
53 ms
t.php
147 ms
quant.js
42 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
32 ms
pagingbg_blue2.png
31 ms
pixel;r=1323454796;a=p-fe4MnL42VsIwA;fpan=1;fpa=P0-750904311-1458155556333;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458155556333;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Frecomparison.com%2F;ogl=
9 ms
comparisonz.com SEO score
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparisonz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparisonz.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
comparisonz.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparisonz. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: