Tools & Wizards About Us
competingvalues.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

competingvalues.com

Jeff DeGraff - A Speaker and a Consultant

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

224 ms

competingvalues.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to competingvalues.com homepage info - get ready to check Competingvalues best content right away, or after learning these important things about competingvalues.com

Jeff DeGraff is an advisor to Fortune 500 companies, a top innovation speaker, a business professor at the Ross School of Business, and an author.

Visit competingvalues.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Competingvalues.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

competingvalues.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

competingvalues.com

121 ms

www.innovatrium.org

166 ms

www.innovatrium.org

283 ms

js

66 ms

formidableforms.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Competingvalues.com, 73% (32 requests) were made to Innovatrium.org and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (459 ms) relates to the external source Innovatrium.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Competingvalues.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 994.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 49.5 kB

  • Original 62.7 kB
  • After minification 55.5 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 61.2 kB

  • Original 994.7 kB
  • After minification 933.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competingvalues images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 519.5 kB
  • After minification 519.5 kB
  • After compression 518.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 107.5 kB
  • After minification 107.5 kB
  • After compression 106.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competingvalues.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (40%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competingvalues. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

competingvalues.com

competingvalues.com

121 ms

www.innovatrium.org

www.innovatrium.org

166 ms

www.innovatrium.org

www.innovatrium.org

283 ms

js

js

66 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

24 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

40 ms

bundle-5d9379dfec.css

bundle-5d9379dfec.css

167 ms

style.css

style.css

29 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

37 ms

bundle-bddfecbcd9.js

bundle-bddfecbcd9.js

48 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

42 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

43 ms

frm.min.js

frm.min.js

89 ms

api.js

api.js

35 ms

css

css

32 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

22 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

11 ms

innovatrium-the-creative-mindset.jpg

innovatrium-the-creative-mindset.jpg

68 ms

slider-img-1.jpg

slider-img-1.jpg

71 ms

innovatrium-header-study-5-1920x1187.jpg

innovatrium-header-study-5-1920x1187.jpg

74 ms

section-img-3@2x-294x300.png

section-img-3@2x-294x300.png

240 ms

section-img-1@2x-1024x271.png

section-img-1@2x-1024x271.png

69 ms

box-img-1@2x.png

box-img-1@2x.png

68 ms

box-img-2@2x.png

box-img-2@2x.png

71 ms

box-img-3@2x.png

box-img-3@2x.png

71 ms

innovation-library@2x.png

innovation-library@2x.png

72 ms

pepsi.svg

pepsi.svg

71 ms

prudential.svg

prudential.svg

73 ms

pfizer.svg

pfizer.svg

74 ms

CPInnovator@2x-300x186.png

CPInnovator@2x-300x186.png

370 ms

jeff-degraff@2x-300x186.png

jeff-degraff@2x-300x186.png

360 ms

innovation-you@2x-300x186.png

innovation-you@2x-300x186.png

75 ms

usaf-innovation-genome@2x-300x186.png

usaf-innovation-genome@2x-300x186.png

75 ms

michigan-ross@2x-300x186.png

michigan-ross@2x-300x186.png

75 ms

AIM-HI-White-and-Color-Highlights-Icon-RGB-300x300.png

AIM-HI-White-and-Color-Highlights-Icon-RGB-300x300.png

75 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

68 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

57 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

37 ms

FontAwesome5BrandsRegular.woff

FontAwesome5BrandsRegular.woff

459 ms

Accessibility Review

competingvalues.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

competingvalues.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

competingvalues.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competingvalues.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competingvalues.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

competingvalues.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Competingvalues. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: