Tools & Wizards About Us
competitive.business screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 93% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

competitive.business

Monitor Competitors' Marketing Strategy - Competitors App

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

691 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

competitive.business screenshot

About Website

Visit competitive.business now to see the best up-to-date Competitive content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about competitive.business

Takes only 5 minutes a week to monitor your competitors' most essential actions. You will read the emails we send you every time a competitor is marking a significant move.

Visit competitive.business

Key Findings

We analyzed Competitive.business page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

competitive.business performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

competitors.app

691 ms

gtm.js

62 ms

ca-emblem-white-transparent.svg

278 ms

analytics.js

252 ms

fbevents.js

296 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Competitive.business, 20% (6 requests) were made to Pics.competitors.app and 17% (5 requests) were made to Duusb7hw904ji.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (691 ms) relates to the external source Competitors.app.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.9 kB (57%)

Content Size

117.2 kB

After Optimization

50.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Competitive.business main page is 117.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 87.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 65.9 kB

  • Original 87.4 kB
  • After minification 83.1 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 15 B

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competitive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 953 B

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 22.9 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

competitors.app

competitors.app

691 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

ca-emblem-white-transparent.svg

ca-emblem-white-transparent.svg

278 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

252 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

296 ms

8fab2jrjto

8fab2jrjto

375 ms

competitors-logo-noc-white-red.svg

competitors-logo-noc-white-red.svg

381 ms

burger-menu.svg

burger-menu.svg

239 ms

wave.svg

wave.svg

357 ms

Convertful.js

Convertful.js

360 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

359 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

361 ms

modernizr-3.6.0.min.js

modernizr-3.6.0.min.js

366 ms

all-min.js

all-min.js

399 ms

product-hunt-featured.svg

product-hunt-featured.svg

581 ms

all.css

all.css

395 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

299616110665570

299616110665570

358 ms

collect

collect

334 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

263 ms

feature-emails-compressor.png

feature-emails-compressor.png

385 ms

ca-emblem-transparent.svg

ca-emblem-transparent.svg

268 ms

wave-light.svg

wave-light.svg

173 ms

feature-social-media-compressor.png

feature-social-media-compressor.png

412 ms

feature-website-compressor.png

feature-website-compressor.png

382 ms

feature-keywords-compressor.png

feature-keywords-compressor.png

314 ms

testimonial-waves-compressor.png

testimonial-waves-compressor.png

358 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

121 ms

collect

collect

10 ms

c.gif

c.gif

38 ms

Accessibility Review

competitive.business accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

competitive.business best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

competitive.business SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitive.business can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competitive.business main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

competitive.business

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Competitive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: