2.6 sec in total
606 ms
1.8 sec
178 ms
Visit completefisher.com now to see the best up-to-date Completefisher content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about completefisher.com
Visit completefisher.comWe analyzed Completefisher.com page load time and found that the first response time was 606 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
completefisher.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
606 ms
172 ms
175 ms
259 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Completefisher.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to C.statcounter.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Completefisher.com.
Page size can be reduced by 100.0 kB (25%)
408.2 kB
308.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Completefisher.com main page is 408.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 297.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Completefisher images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 21.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (25%)
48
36
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Completefisher. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
completefisher.com
606 ms
jspngfix.js
172 ms
jsDetectBrowser.js
175 ms
jsMenus.js
259 ms
frames.js
8 ms
wp1bb53edd.gif
86 ms
wpbd2cbbe9.png
247 ms
wpde6beea8.png
86 ms
wpa5d0aa96.png
89 ms
wp2530ddd0.png
160 ms
wp7cbd9a41.png
164 ms
wpb9e2b7d7.png
169 ms
wpd95a7c68.png
172 ms
wp730cddf1.png
173 ms
wp47578524.png
239 ms
wp2f256ece.png
246 ms
wpfc821c22.png
251 ms
wp70929441.png
253 ms
wpe0b51ee5.gif
256 ms
wpedbc9b58.png
317 ms
wpadcdecf0.jpg
607 ms
wpdb383a5e.jpg
691 ms
wpa8ba8b7e_0f.jpg
420 ms
wpb0dddf52.png
356 ms
wp972d6962_0f.jpg
531 ms
wpb32edcbd.png
396 ms
wpbb874978.png
439 ms
wp30d85f80.png
475 ms
wpb9931d99.png
505 ms
wpd6335200.png
521 ms
wp9dce76e8_0f.jpg
837 ms
wp3bc7d137_0f.jpg
602 ms
wp9191ae16_0f.jpg
938 ms
wp7e5fb97f.png
1096 ms
wp9e30e7ba_0f.jpg
702 ms
wp8deedf5b_0f.jpg
710 ms
wp934cd0dd.png
767 ms
wp9c3e36d5.png
778 ms
wpea038984.png
786 ms
wp78c4c8de.png
849 ms
wp6bf216cc.png
859 ms
t.php
54 ms
t.php
52 ms
wp3352b4b2.png
795 ms
wp9d602b17.png
856 ms
wpf3983656.png
857 ms
wp4d70b712.png
793 ms
wpf679308a.png
798 ms
wp912cc313.png
855 ms
completefisher.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
completefisher.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
completefisher.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Completefisher.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Completefisher.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
completefisher.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Completefisher. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: