Tools & Wizards About Us
computeraftercare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

computeraftercare.com

Computer Preventive Maintenance by ComputerAfterCare

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

2.8 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

computeraftercare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit computeraftercare.com now to see the best up-to-date Computer After Care content for Philippines and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about computeraftercare.com

Just how important is computer preventive maintenance? How often have you heard someone complain their computer broke after their 1 year warranty expired?

Visit computeraftercare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Computeraftercare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

computeraftercare.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

computeraftercare.com

2782 ms

typography.css

57 ms

blog-style.css

52 ms

otw_sbm.css

61 ms

style.min.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Computeraftercare.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Yceml.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to Cj.dotomi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Computeraftercare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 237.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

964.1 kB

After Optimization

727.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Computeraftercare.com main page is 964.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 539.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 57.9 kB

  • Original 73.9 kB
  • After minification 72.8 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 117.8 kB

  • Original 539.2 kB
  • After minification 421.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Computer After Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 117.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 46.0 kB

  • Original 308.6 kB
  • After minification 308.6 kB
  • After compression 262.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 42.4 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Computeraftercare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (57%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Computer After Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

computeraftercare.com

computeraftercare.com

2782 ms

typography.css

typography.css

57 ms

blog-style.css

blog-style.css

52 ms

otw_sbm.css

otw_sbm.css

61 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

66 ms

styles.css

styles.css

306 ms

style.css

style.css

60 ms

social_widget.css

social_widget.css

70 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

95 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

74 ms

js_cookie.js

js_cookie.js

75 ms

jwplayer.js

jwplayer.js

10 ms

authorbox-ltr.css

authorbox-ltr.css

85 ms

loader.js

loader.js

7 ms

si_captcha.js

si_captcha.js

86 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

94 ms

qtobject.js

qtobject.js

95 ms

flowplayer-3.2.10.min.js

flowplayer-3.2.10.min.js

104 ms

flowplayer.ipad-3.2.9.min.js

flowplayer.ipad-3.2.9.min.js

104 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

29 ms

all.js

all.js

43 ms

loader.js

loader.js

42 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

99 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

95 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

110 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

103 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

105 ms

index.js

index.js

223 ms

index.js

index.js

244 ms

new-tab.js

new-tab.js

126 ms

combinebottom.js

combinebottom.js

186 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

32 ms

e0111p59y31NVOQXOWWNPOSWRWXWNPSQVQXSUWOOOO

e0111p59y31NVOQXOWWNPOSWRWXWNPSQVQXSUWOOOO

39 ms

q879o26v0zKSLNULTTKMMMMPLRSKMPNMTPUONRLLL

q879o26v0zKSLNULTTKMMMMPLRSKMPNMTPUONRLLL

38 ms

am77y7B-53PXQSZQYYPRQTXYRSRPRUSUZWUSRZQQQ

am77y7B-53PXQSZQYYPRQTXYRSRPRUSUZWUSRZQQQ

43 ms

250x250.jpg

250x250.jpg

264 ms

e6108o26v0zKSLNULTTKMLQSLPUTKMOUULQUUPOLLL

e6108o26v0zKSLNULTTKMLQSLPUTKMOUULQUUPOLLL

40 ms

3n115jy1qwuFNGIPGOOFHGOLPHJNFHKINIPKMOGGGG

3n115jy1qwuFNGIPGOOFHGOLPHJNFHKINIPKMOGGGG

38 ms

gd103nswkqo9HACJAII9BBBBEAID9BECBIEJDCGAAA

gd103nswkqo9HACJAII9BBBBEAID9BECBIEJDCGAAA

40 ms

blogbk.png

blogbk.png

42 ms

computeraftercare.com

computeraftercare.com

314 ms

computer-maintenance-training.jpg

computer-maintenance-training.jpg

50 ms

broken-computer.jpg

broken-computer.jpg

51 ms

happy-computer.png

happy-computer.png

49 ms

knowledge-pays-best-interest.png

knowledge-pays-best-interest.png

94 ms

physical-computer-maintenance-300x251.png

physical-computer-maintenance-300x251.png

137 ms

readmore_button.gif

readmore_button.gif

93 ms

software-maintenance-300x251.png

software-maintenance-300x251.png

137 ms

malware-prevention1-300x251.png

malware-prevention1-300x251.png

94 ms

data-backup-300x251.png

data-backup-300x251.png

267 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

103 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

102 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

136 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

136 ms

M

M

95 ms

M

M

94 ms

I

I

92 ms

G

G

94 ms

10570498-1509731564816

10570498-1509731564816

93 ms

N

N

98 ms

all.js

all.js

62 ms

dividerbar-wide.png

dividerbar-wide.png

110 ms

talkicon.png

talkicon.png

108 ms

blogfooter.png

blogfooter.png

109 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

65 ms

O

O

56 ms

8

8

55 ms

P

P

54 ms

9

9

52 ms

1

1

137 ms

settings

settings

101 ms

10859137-1559767799942

10859137-1559767799942

30 ms

11114067-1611189271161

11114067-1611189271161

26 ms

11114083-1538176699272

11114083-1538176699272

25 ms

10483898-1559767465743

10483898-1559767465743

26 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

5 ms

embeds

embeds

29 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

11 ms

10378121-1656448541207

10378121-1656448541207

13 ms

Accessibility Review

computeraftercare.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

computeraftercare.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

computeraftercare.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Computeraftercare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Computeraftercare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

computeraftercare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Computer After Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: